Laserfiche WebLink
CHAIRMAN LYONS ASKED FOR THE COMMISSION'S WISH IN CONNECTION <br />WITH CHANGE ORDER #4 ON THE COURTHOUSE. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT, IN HIS OPINION, THIS REALLY <br />IS NOT A CHANGE ORDER - IT IS WORK THAT WAS NOT INSTRUCTED TO BE DONE, <br />AND WE REALLY DON'T HAVE AN OPTION. <br />MR. KONTOULAS AGREED THAT WHAT THE SPECIFICATIONS CALL FOR <br />IS A "MISMATCH," AND THAT IS WHAT WE WILL GET IF THIS WORK IS NOT DONE. <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD ASKED WHAT IT WOULD DO TO THE TIME SCHEDULE <br />IF THE BOARD DID NOT APPROVE THIS CHANGE ORDER. <br />MR. KONTOULAS STATED THAT THE PROPOSAL WOULD BE WITHDRAWN <br />AND THE DAYS EXTENDED, AND IT WOULD COST MORE MONEY. HE NOTED THEY <br />ARE READY TO GO AHEAD ON THIS RIGHT NOW. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON CONFIRMED THAT IT IS THEIR STRONG <br />RECOMMENDATION THAT THIS CHANGE ORDER BE ACCEPTED. HE NOTED THAT THEY <br />SET THE STAGE TO HAVE SOME RECOURSE TO GO BACK BECAUSE THE CONTRACTOR <br />ORIGINALLY WANTED TO HAVE THE 20 DAYS GUARANTEED, BUT THIS WAS NEGOTI- <br />ATED AND COMPROMISED WITH THE WORDING ON THE CHANGE ORDER. <br />DISCUSSION ENSUED ABOUT CHANGING THE WORDING ON THE CHANGE <br />ORDER AS SUGGESTED EARLIER, AND MR. KONTOULAS STATED THAT HE WOULD <br />GET THE "WILL" CHANGED TO "MAY" ON THE NEXT CHANGE ORDER. THE BOARD <br />GENERALLY FELT THEY WISHED TO HAVE IT CHANGED ON THIS CHANGE ORDER <br />AND SUGGESTED THAT IT BE CHANGED AND INITIALED AND SENT TO THE <br />CONTRACTOR THAT WAY. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK BELIEVED WE HAVE TO RELY ON THE <br />ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION, BUT NOTED THAT HE WILL BE LOOKING <br />AT THIS CLOSELY IN THE FUTURE. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />BIRD, COMMISSIONER FLETCHER VOTED IN OPPOSITION, THE BOARD ACCEPTED <br />CHANGE ORDER #4 FOR THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COURTHOUSE WITH THE <br />CHANGING OF THE WORD "WILL" TO "MAY" AND AUTHORIZED THE SIGNATURE OF <br />THE CHAIRMAN. <br />45 80015 ����290 <br />NOV 19 190 <br />