Laserfiche WebLink
MR. KONTOULAS NEXT DISCUSSED CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL IFR, <br />NOTING THAT HE NORMALLY DOES NOT PRESENT CHANGE ORDER PROPOSALS TO THE <br />BOARD, BUT SINCE THIS ONE INVOLVES APPROXIMATELY $30,000, HE FELT HE <br />SHOULD HAVE THE BOARD'S APPROVAL BEFORE ASKING THAT THE CHANGE ORDER <br />BE WRITTEN. MR. KONTOULAS NOTED THAT THERE ARE ERRORS IN SOME OF THE <br />FIGURES ON THE BREAKDOWN, AND THIS WILL BE TAKEN CARE OF IF WE PROCEED <br />WITH THE CHANGE ORDER, HE THEN WENT TO THE EASEL TO POINT OUT ON A <br />CHART, THE ROOMS INVOLVED, I.E., JURY ROOM, HEARING ROOMS, ANTEROOM, <br />SECRETARIAL AREA, FOUR CIRCUIT COURT .JUDGES' OFFICES, AND COURTROOMS. <br />HE STATED THAT EVERYTHING IN THIS AREA IS PROPOSED TO BE DONE IN <br />VARIOUS GRADES OF PANELING AS PER JUDGE SMITH'S REQUEST. HE PASSED <br />OUT SAMPLES OF MATERIALS AND NOTED THAT A VENEER WITH A BACKING ON IT <br />WOULD GO IN THE COURTROOMS OVER THE DRYWALL BECAUSE OF THE THICKNESS <br />OF THE WALL. THE OTHER ROOMS WOULD GO TO REAL PANELING - THE JURY <br />ROOMS AND HEARING ROOMS TO BE DONE IN A LOW GRADE WOOD PANELING - <br />THE SECRETARIAL AREA AND THE .JUDGES' WAITING ROOMS TO BE DONE IN A <br />MEDIUM GRADE PANELING, AND THE .JUDGES' OFFICES TO BE DONE IN A GOOD <br />GRADE OF PANELING. MR, KONTOULAS STATED THAT IT WOULD COST $17,000 <br />TO INSTALL THE PROPOSED MATERIAL IN THE COURTROOMS AND $9,438 FOR <br />THE REMAINING ROOMS. <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD ASKED WHAT THE SPECIFICATIONS CALL FOR <br />PRESENTLY, AND MR. KONTOULAS REPORTED THAT THEY CALL FOR NO FINISH <br />OTHER THAN EXISTING WALLS AND SOME PAINT. <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD ASKED IF THERE WAS ANY POSSIBILITY OF <br />HAVING AN AREA LIKE THIS DONE BY LOCAL CONTRACTORS. <br />MR, KONTOULAS STATED THAT LEG -ALL`! t'!E COULD ASK FOR THE WORK <br />TO BE DONE BY LOCAL CONTRACTORS AS LONG AS IT DID NOT INTERFERE WITH <br />THE MAIN CONTRACTOR, AND WE COULD AT A LATER DATE ACCEPT BIDS FOR <br />DOING THIS PARTICULAR WORK. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK COMMENTED THAT WHEN THESE SPECIFICATION! <br />ORIGINALLY WERE REVIEWED BY THE JUDGES, THERE WAS NO PROBLEM WITH THE <br />FINISH AND NO OBJECTIONS WERE RAISED. <br />NOV 19190Q <br />L <br />A <br />47 4GI29 <br />