My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/19/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
11/19/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:55 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:43:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/19/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
21 <br />NOV 91��0 <br />Boos 45 PAcE 301 <br />MR. NELSON REPORTED THAT HE HAS JUST RECEIVED A COMPACTION <br />TEST OF THE ROAD AND ALSO HAS A SEALED CERTIFICATION FROM KUHRT & <br />ASSOCIATES STATING THAT THE PAVING DOES MEET SPECIFICATIONS; IN ADDI- <br />TION, HE HAS A CHECK IN HAND MADE OUT TO THE COMMISSION FOR $3,000 <br />TO COVER THE SEEDING AND MULCHING. THE ADMINISTRATOR NOTED THAT THE <br />REASON THE DEVELOPER DOES NOT WANT TO SEED AND MULCH RIGHT NOW IS <br />BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO WAY TO IRRIGATE. HE NOTED THAT THE QUALITY OF <br />PAVING IN THE ROAD IS NOT A GOOD QUALITY; IT APPEARS THAT IT DOES <br />MEET COUNTY SPECIFICATIONS, BUT IT IS NOT SMOOTH. HE COMMENTED THAT <br />EVEN THOUGH IT IS A PRIVATE ROAD, WE INVARIABLY GET COMPLAINTS. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK ASKED IF APPROVAL WOULD BE SUBJECT TO <br />A SATISFACTORY TEST, AND THE ADMINISTRATOR AGREED THAT IT WOULD. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT UNDER THE TERMS OF OUR RECENT <br />AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF VERO BEACH, WHEN THE ENGINEERING STUDIES <br />ARE FINISHED AND WE KNOW WHAT THE COSTS ARE TO PUT IN THE LINE TO <br />THE SOUTH BEACH AREA, THE NON -VESTED PROPERTY OWNERS WILL PAY THEIR <br />PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF THE COST OF THE LINE, PROBABLY BASED ON AN <br />ACREAGE FIGURE. HE STATED THAT HE WAS CONCERNED THAT IF THE LOTS <br />ARE SOLD RIGHT AWAY, THE COUNTY COULD HAVE TROUBLE COLLECTING THIS <br />MONEY, AND HE, THEREFORE, WOULD SUGGEST THAT THE BOARD GET AN AGREE- <br />MENT FROM THE DEVELOPER MAKING HIM RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYMENT FOR ALL <br />THE LOTS. HE NOTED THAT THE DEVELOPER HAS INDICATED THAT HE WILL DO <br />THIS. ATTORNEY COLLINS CONTINUED THAT ABOUT EIGHT MONTHS AGO, THE <br />COUNTY ACCEPTED OCEANSIDE SUBDIVISION FOR RECORDING AND PUT A STATEMENT <br />ON THAT PLAT THAT THERE WAS NO FRESH WATER AVAILABLE TO THE SUBDIVISION <br />AT THE TIME OF RECORDING. THIS WAS TO PUT THE PUBLIC ON NOTICE. THE <br />MOTION TO GIVE TENTATIVE APPROVAL TO THIS PLAT WAS SUBJECT TO WATER <br />BEING AVAILABLE, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS COMMENTED THAT IF THE BOARD <br />DOES APPROVE THE PLAT TODAY, THEY WILL BE OVERRIDING THAT ONE CONDITION. <br />HE FELT THE PUBLIC SHOULD BE PUT ON NOTICE THAT THERE IS NO WATER <br />AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.