Laserfiche WebLink
DEC 31980 Boas .45 PAGE 380 <br />MR. SNODGRASS ASKED THAT THE SECOND SENTENCE BEGIN THAT <br />IF THERE IS A DELAY DUE TO THE EXTRA WORK, THEY WILL BE PAID. <br />WITH IT. <br />MR. KONTOULAS FELT THAT WAS CLEAR, AND HE HAD NO PROBLEM <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED BACK AND FORTH ABOUT THE WORDING, <br />AND CHAIRMAN LYONS STATED THAT HE DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE CHANGE <br />REQUESTED. <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD ASKED WHETHER THE ADDITIONAL 20 DAYS, <br />IF GRANTED, WOULD GIVE THEM 20 DAYS BEYOND THE CONTRACT COMPLETION <br />DATE. <br />MR. SNODGRASS STATED THAT IT WOULD,IF THEY ACTUALLY NEED <br />THE EXTRA TIME. <br />O <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD CONTINUED THAT IF THEY THEN ASKED FOR <br />ANOTHER 20 DAYS, WOULD THAT THEN BE 40 DAYS ADDED AT THE END OF THE <br />CONTRACT, AND MR. SNODGRASS STATED THAT IT WOULD NOT - IF THEY ARE <br />REQUIRED TO WORK AN ADDITIONAL 20 DAYS, ALL THEY ARE ASKING FOR IS <br />THAT 20; IT DOESN'T MATTER IF ALL THE DAYS REQUESTED ADD UP TO 2.00, <br />THEY ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE 20. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS HAD A CONFERENCE WITH ATTORNEY COLLINS, WHO <br />FELT IT COULD BE STATED THAT THE PROPOSED CHANGES MAY RESULT IN <br />ADDITIONAL TIME, AND THAT IT WOULD BE ALL RIGHT TO LEAVE IT THAT <br />ADDITIONAL TIME WILL BE ADDED. HE DID NOT FEEL THIS WOULD PUT US <br />IN ANY MORE TROUBLE THEN WE WERE BEFORE. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER ASKED COMMISSIONER WODTKE IF HE HAD <br />NOT BEEN CONCERNED TWO WEEKS AGO ABOUT A POSSIBLE CUMULATIVE EFFECT. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE STATED THAT HE DID HAVE THAT CONCERN <br />AND NOTED THAT THE COUNTY ALSO HAS HAD SOME PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE WITH <br />THE WORDS "WILL" AND "MAY." HE STATED THAT THE EXPLANATION MADE <br />TODAY IS SATISFACTORY TO HIM AS IT IS WRITTEN TO THE EXTENT THAT <br />THERE HAS TO BE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE ADDITIONAL TIME, AND IF IT IS <br />JUSTIFIED, WE HAVE TO PAY FOR IT. <br />MR. SNODGRASS NOTED THAT THEY DID NOT CREATE THE WORDING; <br />THE ARCHITECT DID. <br />