My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/31/1980
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1980
>
12/31/1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:48:56 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:48:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/31/1980
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK NOTED THAT AT THE PREVIOUS MEETING <br />HE HAD BEEN APPOINTED TO WORK WITH THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATOR <br />TO COME UP WITH A PROPOSAL FOR CREATION OF A FINANCE ADVISORY <br />COMMISSION, AND HE HAD INCLUDED WITH THE INFORMATION MATERIAL FOR <br />TODAY `S MEETING, A WORK PAPER OUTLINING THE PROPOSED DUTIES, LIMITATION, <br />ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, ETC., OF SUCH A COMMISSION, HE FELT WE MAY <br />NEED SOME IN-DEPTH STUDY IN REGARD TO SELECTING A FIRM TO PERFORM AN <br />INDEPENDENT ANNUAL AUDIT AND THAT THIS SHOULD BE COORDINATED WITH <br />THE CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS. <br />FINANCE DIRECTOR BARTON BELIEVED THIS WORK PAPER IS A VERY <br />GOOD START AND STATED HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE SUCH A COMMISSION SET UP <br />AS A LIAISON BETWEEN THE CLERK AND THE BOARD. HE FELT SUCH EXPERTISE <br />COULD BE VERY HELPFUL, ESPECIALLY RELATING TO BOND ISSUES. <br />IT WAS AGREED THAT THE BOARD MEMBERS WOULD REVIEW THE <br />PROPOSAL AND SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS. <br />ADVERTISEMENT OF PROPOSED PRECIOUS METALS ORDINANCE <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS REPORTED THAT THE CITY ATTORNEY HAS PRE- <br />PARED AN ORDINANCE DEALING WITH HOW TO REGULATE THE PURCHASING AND <br />RAPID RESELLING OF VALUABLE JEWELRY AND METALS IN THE COUNTY BY <br />UNLICENSED PERSONNEL. THE GIST OF THE ORDINANCE IS TO HAVE A RECORDING <br />REQUIREMENT AND THEN A DELAYING TERM BEFORE RESELLING, HE CONTINUED <br />THAT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT APPARENTLY IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SHERIFF <br />HAVE REQUESTED THAT THE COUNTY ADOPT AN ORDINANCE SIMILAR TO THAT OF <br />THE CITY AS SIMULTANEOUSLY AS POSSIBLE WITH THE CITY SO THERE CAN BE <br />A UNIFORM APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM THAT PRESENTLY EXISTS IN THIS AREA. <br />THE ATTORNEY STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AUTHORITY TO ADVERTISE <br />FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE FOR THE SECOND MEETING <br />IN .JANUARY AT WHICH TIME WE CAN DISCUSS THE ORDINANCE IN GREATER <br />DETAIL. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER STATED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO REVIEW <br />THE ORDINANCE BEFORE A PUBLIC HEARING IS ADVERTISED BECAUSE HE FELT <br />THAT HE IS BEING ASKED TO OKAY AN -ORDINANCE THAT HE HASN`T-SEEN. <br />DEC 311980 <br />55 aaw 15- PAci572`r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.