Laserfiche WebLink
(7) <br />Section 910.08(2), except for final concurrency determination <br />applications. Each concurrency report will document: <br />(a) the current land use and zoning designation, type and <br />intensity of proposed use, and public facility <br />availability upon which the reviews were based; <br />(b) the specific facilities impacted by the proposed <br />development; <br />(c) the extent of the impact on those facilities by the <br />proposed development; and <br />(d) conditions or stipulations regarding the timing and <br />phasing of the development or provision of facility <br />improvements necessary to ensure that adequate facilities <br />will be available concurrent with the impact of the <br />development. <br />For each concurrency determination application review, the <br />coordinating agency will be responsible for monitoring and <br />enforcing any conditions and/or stipulations contained in <br />previous concurrency determinations. This will be done in <br />order to ensure that consistent concurrency review procedures <br />are maintained and that unnecessary duplication as a result <br />of different concurrency determination reviews is avoided. <br />Section 910.08 Determination of Concurrency, Generally <br />(1) Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies, the approval <br />of development orders shall be contingent upon a finding that <br />adequate public facilities are available, consistent with <br />their adopted levels of service and concurrent with the impact <br />of the proposed development. Such determination of <br />concurrency made during the review of a concurrency <br />determination application which is not an initial or final <br />concurrency determination does not guarantee that there will <br />automatically be a finding of concurrency at subsequent steps <br />in the process for a given property or a proposed development. <br />However, a finding of concurrency made at the initial <br />concurrency determination stage may be used as a basis for a <br />finding of concurrency determination during the review of a <br />final concurrency determination application provided that: <br />(a) the previously approved concurrency determination remains <br />in effect, as determined by the time limit imposed upon <br />the concurrency determination certificate; <br />(b) the impact of the proposed development under <br />consideration was fully taken into account during the <br />concurrency review and in the finding of concurrency <br />associated with the previously approved concurrency <br />determination certificate; <br />(c) the conditions related to land uses and facility <br />availability upon which the previous finding was based <br />117 <br />