Laserfiche WebLink
JAN 141981 <br />aaoK 45 FAGS uo <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK REPORTED THAT HE HAD TAKEN AN IN-DEPTH <br />LOOK, PUT IN 25 HOURS WORTH OF RESEARCH, AND EXAMINED THE RECORDS <br />I <br />WITH THE FINANCE DIRECTOR. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS SUGGESTED THAT COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK BE <br />PREPARED AT BUDGET SESSION TIME TO COME UP WITH A PROPOSAL AS TO THE <br />ORDERLY TRANSITION FROM THE PRESENT ATTORNEY TO AN IN-HOUSE ATTORNEY, <br />WITH FIGURES TO REFLECT THE TRANSITION. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER MADE A MOTION TO DEFER THE APPOINTMENT <br />OF ATTORNEY COLLINS AND TABLE THE MATTER UNTIL JANUARY 28TH. IT <br />WAS DETERMINED A SECOND WAS NOT NEEDED FOR THIS MOTION. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />DEFEATED 4 TO 1, WITH COMMISSIONER FLETCHER VOTING IN FAVOR, <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR A ROLL CALL VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL <br />OF THE EXTENSION AGREEMENT. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE - AYE <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD - AYE <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK - HAY - HE INDICATED THAT HE HAD SPENT <br />A GREAT DEAL OF TIME IN RESEARCH WHICH GAVE HIM THE SUPPORT THAT THE <br />BOARD SHOULD BE WORKING TOWARDS A FULL-TIME LEGAL STAFF, WITH A GREAT <br />DEAL OF SAVINGS. COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK COMMENTED THAT HE HAD NO <br />PROBLEM WITH ATTORNEY COLLINS BUT FELT IT WAS APPROPRIATE TO HAVE THIS <br />EXTENSION AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE UP TO THE BUDGET SESSION. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER - NAY - HE COMMENTED THAT HE WAS NOT <br />AGAINST ATTORNEY COLLINS, BUT AGAINST SIGNING THE EXTENTION AGREEMENT. <br />HE WAS IN FAVOR OF GETTING IN-HOUSE LEGAL SERVICES. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS - AYE - HE THOUGHT THE BOARD SHOULD GO TO <br />JANUARY WITH THE EXTENSION AGREEMENT. THE CHAIRMAN AGAIN ASKED <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK TO GET TOGETHER THE NECESSARY PLANS AND BUDGET <br />FIGURES FOR AN ORDERLY TRANSITION FROM THE PRESENT ATTORNEY TO AN <br />IN-HOUSE ATTORNEY. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE INTERJECTED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SIT <br />IN ON THAT COMMITTEE. <br />