My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/28/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
1/28/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:16 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:51:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/28/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JAN 28 1981 BOOK PA a' <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER INQUIRED WHY WE SHOULD NOT ASSESS THE <br />LIQUIDATED DAMAGES, AND COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK BELIEVED THE TIME OVER- <br />RUN WAS DUE TO CIRCUMSTANCES NOT THE FAULT OF THE CONTRACTOR AND THAT <br />HE DID MAKE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED 4-0, COMMISSIONER WODTKE BEING ABSENT FROM THE MEETING. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER WISHED TO QUALIFY HIS AYE. HE STATED <br />THAT HE BELIEVED IN HONORING OUR COMMITMENT; ALTHOUGH, HE DID NOT <br />BELIEVE IN THE OVERALL CONCEPT OF THE SOUTH COUNTY WATER SYSTEM. <br />MR. TESSIER NEXT REPORTED THAT GERAGHTY & MILLER ARE ASKING <br />FOR AN INCREASE IN THEIR CONTRACT AMOUNT BECAUSE OF AN INCREASE IN <br />TASK 2, WHICH REPRESENTS ADDITIONAL TIME AND EXPENSE INCURRED IN <br />SUPERVISING AND INSPECTING THE PROJECT WHICH HAD AN OVERRUN OF 16 <br />DAYS. HE NOTED THAT ONE ADDITIONAL ITEM IS THE EXTENSIVE WATER <br />QUALITY ANALYSIS NECESSARY. THE ONLY LABORATORY CAPABLE OF HANDLING <br />SUCH AN EXTENSIVE ANALYSIS WAS LOCATED IN WEST PALM BEACH, AND THE <br />SAMPLES HAD TO BE TAKEN THERE WITHIN 24 HOURS. HE STATED THAT <br />GERAGHTY & MILLER DID ALL THE SAMPLE COLLECTING, ETC., IN CONJUNCTION <br />WITH THE LABORATORY; THE LABORATORY WILL INVOICE GERAGHTY & MILLER <br />$2,000, AND THEY IN TURN WILL ADD THIS TO THEIR CONTRACT, PLUS THEIR <br />CHARGES. <br />ENGINEER ROBBINS EXPLAINED THAT IT WAS THE ORIGINAL INTEN- <br />TION OF THE .JOINT VENTURE TO TAKE CARE OF THE LAB WORK, BUT IT WORKED <br />OUT BETTER FOR GERAGHTY & MILLER TO HANDLE THIS; S0, THERE NOW WILL <br />BE NO INVOICE FROM THE .JOINT VENTURE RE THIS WATER ANALYSIS. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT FMHA REQUIRING DIFFERENT CONTRACT <br />FORMS WHICH MEANT ADDITIONAL WORK. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONR BIRD, COMMISSIONER WODTKE BEING,ABSENT FROM THE MEETING, THE <br />BOARD APPROVED 4 - O AN INCREASE IN OUR CONTRACT WITH GERAGHTY & <br />MILLER DATED DECEMBER 19, 1979, OR $11,966, MAKING A TOTAL CONTRACT <br />PRICE OF $59,766. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER COMMENDED GERAGHTY & MILLER FOR A <br />BEAUTIFUL PRESENTATION AND FOR THEIR THOROUGHNESS. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.