My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/25/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
2/25/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:16 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:53:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/25/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TELEPHONE GROUNDS FOR THE NEW TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT ON THE NORTH AND <br />SOUTH ENDS OF THE COURTHOUSE AND IN THE BASEMENT. THIS WAS AN OMISSION <br />BY THE ARCHITECT'S ELECTRICAL ENGINEER; #11 IS NECESSARY BECAUSE THE <br />DUCT WORK EXISTING IN THE OLD ADMINISTRATION AREA IS NOT SUFFICIENT <br />TO SUPPLY THAT ROOM. <br />MR. KONTOULAS CONTINUED THAT CHANGE ORDER #14 RE THE COUNTY <br />ADMINISTRATION BUILDING PROVIDES FINISHES AS A CLARIFICATION OF #13 <br />BECAUSE ON THE ORIGINAL DRAWINGS THERE WERE SOME CORRIDOR NUMBERS THAT <br />WERE REPEATED. THIS AGAIN IS AN ERROR ON THE ARCHITECT'S PART. HE <br />STATED THAT HE WOULD RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS CHANGE ORDER ALSO AND <br />NOTED THAT AFTER APPROVAL OF THIS CHANGE ORDER, THE TOTAL OVERAGE ON <br />THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING WOULD BE $205,475, WHICH PLUS AN <br />OVERAGE OF $130,076 ON THE COURTHOUSE, WOULD BE A TOTAL OVERAGE OF <br />APPROXIMATELY $335,500. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK STATED THAT WHEN HE FIRST CAME ON THE <br />COMMISSION, HE EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT THE OVERAGE FIGURES FOR THIS <br />RENOVATION, AND HE WISHED TO POINT OUT THAT WHEN HE WAS TALKING ABOUT <br />AN OVERAGE OF $500,000 TO $1,000,000, HE WAS NOT SO ABSURD. <br />MR. KONTOULAS STATED THAT THE PROVISION ABOUT FIREWALLS IS <br />THE LARGEST OUTSTANDING CHANGE ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED, AND HE DID NOT <br />BELIEVE THERE WILL BE ANYTHING SIGNIFICANT AFTER THAT. HE STATED THAT <br />THE OVERAGE WILL NOT APPROACH A MILLION DOLLARS. <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED AS TO THE OVERAGE, WHICH IT WAS AGREED <br />WAS SIGNIFICANT, AND COORDINATOR THOMAS WISHED TO POINT OUT THAT THE <br />REPORT HE AND THE FINANCE DIRECTOR TURNED IN TO THE BOARD WAS AN OVER- <br />ALL REPORT OF THE ENTIRE FINANCING OF THE RENOVATIONS, INCLUDING NOT <br />ONLY THE CHANGE ORDERS, BUT ALSO THE INCOME WHICH THE FINANCE OFFICER <br />HAS GENERATED AND SOME CONTINGENCIES. HE NOTED THAT OBVIOUSLY WHAT <br />WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT IS THE TOTAL DOLLAR AMOUNT, AND THEY NOW ARE <br />TALKING ABOUT SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCING BASED ON RACt TRACK MONEY; A <br />LITTLE LEEWAY WAS PURPOSELY LEFT IN THE AMOUNT OF THE RACE TRACK FUNDS <br />ORIGINALLY ENCUMBERED. <br />42 ` Pn' E-882 <br />FEB 251981 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.