My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/25/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
2/25/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:16 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:53:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/25/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
F E B 25 1981 <br />o 4: SAGE 83 <br />PLANNING DIRECTOR REVER EXPLAINED THAT THE CENSUS MATERIAL <br />IS COLLECTED ON A SUPPOSEDLY SCIENTIFIC BASIS OF A PARTIAL SURVEY. <br />THE HAP IS A MUCH MORE IN-DEPTH IDENTIFICATION OF SPECIFIC PROBLEMS <br />WHERE THEY WOULD LIKE YOU TO GO OUT IN THE FIELD, HOUSE TO HOUSE, AND <br />SHOW ACTUAL PICTURES. <br />QUESTIONS CONTINUED AS TO WHY THIS WORK CANNOT BE HANDLED <br />IN-HOUSE. IT WAS NOTED THE HOUSING AUTHORITY IS OFFERING THEIR <br />ASSISTANCE. CHAIRMAN LYONS BELIEVED THE HOUSING AUTHORITY CAN DO <br />THE APPLICATION FOR RESUBMISSION, BUT THAT THEY DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH <br />LABOR AVAILABLE TO DO THE HAP, <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK COMMENTED THAT THE HOUSING ASSISTANCE <br />PLAN APPARENTLY IS NEEDED TO CONTINUE WITH OUR O.N-GOING OPERATION WHILE <br />THE $2,50O APPLIES ONLY TO THE COST OF RESUBMISSION OF THE COMMUNITY <br />DEVELOPMENT PRE -APPLICATION; HE WAS OF THE OPINION WE ARE JUST GAMBLING <br />ON GETTING ANY MORE MONEY FROM THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM AND <br />HE DID NOT FEEL THE LETTER WE HAVE RECEIVED IS PARTICULARLY ENCOURAGING. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS POINTED OUT THAT IT IS THE MOST ENCOURAGING <br />LETTER WE HAVE RECEIVED TO DATE. <br />MR. REGAN EXPLAINED THAT WHAT WE HAVE EFFECTIVELY DONE IS LET HUD <br />KNOW THAT INDIAN RIVER COUNTY IS HERE; WE ARE A SMALL COUNTY, ONLY 60,OW <br />PEOPLE, AND IT IS HARD TO GET THE MONEY, WE HAVE, HOWEVER, GOTTEN <br />OTHER FUNDS - SECTION S HOUSING ASSISTANCE, ETC.- AND NOT TO STAY IN <br />THERE AND LET THEM KNOW WE ARE FIGHTING HARD FOR THESE FUNDS WOULD BE <br />A GRIEVOUS ERROR. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY NEEDING THE <br />HAP IN ORDER TO KEEP OPERATIVE, AND COMMISSIONER WODTKE FELT THAT A <br />PORTION OF THE COST OF THE PLAN SHOULD BE CHARGEABLE TO THE HOUSING <br />AUTHORITY IN THE FORM OF A LOAN. MR. REGAN POINTED OUT THAT IF WE - <br />SHOULD GET A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRANT, THE TOTAL COSTS ARE REFUNDABLE <br />AGAINST THE GRANT. <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD ASKED WHERE THE MONEY COMES FROM, AND <br />FINANCE DIRECTOR BARTON STATED THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE A TRANSFER FROM <br />ONE OF THE RESERVE ACCOUNTS TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY BECAUSE THEY ARE <br />ALREADY OPERATING ON BORROWED MONEY. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.