My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/11/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
3/11/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:16 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 12:56:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/11/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MAR 111981 <br />40 PAGE 40 <br />IT DOUBTFUL, UNDER PEAK HOUR CONDITIONS, WHETHER FIRE SERVICE COULD <br />BE FURNISHED AT PRESENT. COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK NOTED THAT WOULD ONLY <br />BE TRUE IF EVERYONE WITH A VESTED INTEREST HAD A TAP. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER WISHED TO DETERMINE THAT THE TOTAL <br />FIGURE OF $1,787,000 DOES NOT INCLUDE THE GROUND STORAGE TANK, <br />INTEREST OF FINANCING, ETC., AND MR. ROBBINS CONFIRMED THAT WAS <br />CORRECT. HE STATED THAT BY THE BOARD'S AUTHORIZATION THEY PREPARED <br />THE PRELIMINARY REPORT AND BY COMMITTEE MEETING HAVE GONE INTO THE <br />SUPPLEMENT, WHICH CONTAINS A COMBINATION OF THOUGHTS OF THE ATTORNEY, <br />THE UTILITY DIRECTOR AND THE CHAIRMAN. THIS DOES NOT OUTLINE ALL <br />OPTIONS AVAILABLE, BUT WHAT APPEARED TO BE THE MOST FAVORABLE OPTIONS <br />AVAILABLE IN REGARD TO GETTING THIS FUNDED, <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK COMMENTED THAT HE HAS SOME EXPERTISE <br />IN THIS MATTER AND HE HAD NOT BEEN AWARE THERE WAS A COMMITTEE FORMED <br />OR THAT THERE WERE COMMITTEE MEETINGS GOING ON. ENGINEER ROBBINS <br />BELIEVED THAT It COMMITTEE It WAS THE WRONG TERMINOLOGY; ACTUALLY, HE <br />JUST REQUESTED A GROUP GET TOGETHER TO GIVE HIM SOME DIRECTION. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS EXPLAINED THAT HE HAD BEEN GIVEN THE <br />RESPONSIBILITY SOME TIME AGO TO TRY TO SOLVE THIS PARTICULAR PROBLEM, <br />AND AS A CONSEQUENCE, HE HAS BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH MR. ROBBINS. <br />HE REQUESTED THAT MR, ROBBINS REVIEW THE SUPPLEMENT. <br />MR. ROBBINS NOTED THAT THEY FIRST BEGAN TO STUDY SUPPLYING <br />WATER TO THE ENTIRE SOUTH BEACH AREA BACK IN 1978; THEY HAVE BEEN <br />WORKING WITH THE CITY EVER SINCE TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM AND NOW HAVE <br />GENERATED COSTS, SIZES, ETC., AND ARE BASICALLY IN AGREEMENT WITH THE <br />CITY ENGINEERS. HE NOTED THERE WERE ADDITIONAL REQUESTS MADE BY <br />DEVELOPERS TO TIE TN UNDER THE OLD MOORINGS AGREEMENT, AND THERE WAS <br />THE ALTERNATIVE OF AN IMPACT FEE. THE BASIC CRITERIA WAS DEVELOPING <br />AN OVERALL WAY TO GENERATE FUNDS AND THEN GENERATE METHODOLOGY FOR <br />DEVELOPERS WHO WANT TO RECEIVE WATER SERVICE NOW. <br />MR. ROBBINS THEN READ ALTERNATIVE #1 AND DISCUSSED VESTED <br />INTERESTS. HE EXPLAINED IN DETAIL HOW HE REACHED A FIGURE OF 3,700 <br />40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.