3/16/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CHAIRMAN LYONS STATED THAT HE UNDERSTOOD MR. REINHOLD'S CONCERN AND THAT HE HAS ASKED US TO DO A SPECIFIC THING; OUR LAWYER HAS INDICATED HE IS WILLING TO DO A SPECIFIC THING; WE UNDERSTAND WHAT THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUESTING AND WILL TRY TO HELP. MR, REINHOLD THEN WENT ON TO DISCUSS FIREWALLS, NOTING THAT AT THE EVENING MEETING OF MARCH 18TH, IT WAS HIS UNDERSTANDING THAT A LETTER WAS SENT TO THE COUNTY'S CONSULTANT REGARDING CERTAIN FIREWALL CONSTRUCTION. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT AS OF THIS DATE, THE CONTRACTOR HAS RECEIVED NO INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE COUNTY'S CONSULTANT, EITHER VER- BALLY OR IN WRITTEN FORM. MR. REINHOLD CONTINUED THAT HIS UNDERSTANDING WAS THAT THE CONTRACTOR WOULD BE REQUESTED TO PREPARE AN ESTIMATE FOR THE WORK THAT WAS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED. HE THEN REVIEWED THE WORK THE CONTRACTOR ALREADY HAS DONE IN RESPECT TO PREPARING SUCH AN ESTIMATE,_NOTING THAT IN NOVEMBER OF 1980, THEY ACCOMPLISHED WHAT WAS INDIdATED ON THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AS ALL THE FIREWALL WORK. THEY CALLED THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND ASKED THEM TO REVIEW THAT WORK BEFORE THEY COVERED IT UP, AND IT WAS AT THIS JUNCTURE THAT ADDITIONAL WORK WAS DISCOVERED. ON NOVEMBER 101 19801 REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION RECEIVED THE FIRST WRITTEN REQUEST FOR A CHANGE PROPOSAL RE FIREWALLS, ACCOM- PANIED WITH A SET OF DOCUMENTS REQUESTING THE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ONE- HOUR FIRE RATED WALLS WHERE NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE FIRE ZONES AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED DRAWINGS. MR. REINHOLD THEN READ ALOUD THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSE TO CHANGE PROPOSAL N0. 37, DATED JANUARY 131 19811 AS FOLLOWS: 45 s R��.A 150