Laserfiche WebLink
MR. KONTOULAS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE HAD TALKED TO THE <br />ARCHITECT TODAY, AND THE WORK ORDER HAS BEEN MAILED. <br />MR. REINHOLD CONTINUED TO EMPHASIZE THAT THE CONTRACTOR <br />ALREADY HAS SUBMITTED THREE PROPOSALS BECAUSE HE WAS NOT SURE THE <br />COMMISSION REALIZED THAT THE CONTRACTOR HAS DONE THIS AND THAT ANOTHER <br />PROPOSAL WOULD ONLY COST MORE MONEY. HE CONTINUED THAT THE FOREGOING <br />PROPOSAL IN THE AMOUNT OF $204,444 WAS WHAT THEY BELIEVED WOULD CREATE <br />TRUE ONE-HOUR FIRE WALLS, THE ARCHITECT THOUGHT THIS WAS TOO MUCH, <br />AND THE CONTRACTOR SUBMITTED ANOTHER PROPOSAL IN THE AMOUNT OF $03,000 <br />ON FEBRUARY 5TH, BUT IT WAS FOR SUBSTANDARD CONSTRUCTION AND DID NOT <br />INCLUDE ALL THE ITEMS NECESSARY. ANOTHER CHANGE PROPOSAL WAS <br />WRITTEN, N0, 37A, AND REINHOLD RESPONDED WITH ANOTHER LETTER; THEN <br />ON FEBRUARY 25TH, THEY WROTE A LETTER TO THE ARCHITECT STATING THAT <br />THE VALIDITY OF THEIR PROPOSAL HAD EXPIRED. MR. REINHOLD STATED IT <br />IS THEIR POSITION THAT REINHOLD HAS DONE EVERYTHING WITHIN THE TERMS <br />OF THEIR CONTRACT AND STANDS READY TO FULFILL THE CONTRACT. HE POINTED <br />OUT THAT IN THE COURTHOUSE, ABOUT 90% OF THE AREAS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED <br />AND ACCEPTED, MR. REINHOLD AGAIN EMPHASIZED THE IMPORTANCE OF COR- <br />RECTING THE INACCURACIES OF THE LETTER SENT BY COUNSEL TO HIS SURETY <br />COMPANY, <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED IN REGARD TO THE NEED FOR ANOTHER <br />PROPOSAL FROM THE CONTRACTOR, MR. KONTOULAS EXPLAINED THAT THE <br />ARCHITECT WISHED THIS BECAUSE SOME THINGS WERE CHANGED VERBALLY, AND <br />THE ARCHITECT WISHED THE $93,000 QUOTATION TO BE -A WRITTEN QUOTATION, <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK COMMENTED THAT A STATEMENT WAS MADE <br />IN REGARD TO A PROPOSAL BEING MADE BY THE ARCHITECT CALLING FOR SUB- <br />STANDARD CONSTRUCTION. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON STATED HE UNDERSTOOD THAT AFTER THE <br />FIRST PROPOSAL FOR $204,000, A MEETING WAS HELD BETWEEN THE BUILDING <br />OFFICIALS, THE CONTRACTOR AND THE ARCHITECTjj.0 DETERMINE WHERE SOME <br />OF THE REQUIREMENTS COULD BE REDUCED AND STILL MEET STANDARDS. <br />MR, REINHOLD STATED IT IS THE CONTRACTORS OPINION THAT THAT <br />CONSTRUCTION IS A COMPROMISE TO WHAT THE CODE CALLS FOR. <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD LEFT THE MEETING AT 4:50 O'CLOCK P.M, <br />5 X981 47 <br />�oox 46 Fur <br />