Laserfiche WebLink
12 <br />61981 <br />.,,359 <br />BASED ON THE AVAILABLE WATER SITUATION, THE IMPACT ON NEIGHBOR S <br />LIFE STYLES, AND THE INSIDE It OF COMMISSIONER FLETCHER. <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS STATED THAT HE PLANNED TO SUPPORT.THE <br />MOTION BECAUSE HE FELT THERE HAS BEEN A THREAT DEMONSTRATED BY THE <br />RECORD THAT WE DO -LOSE AGRICULTURAL LAND; AS TIME GOES ON AND <br />POPULATION GROWS, WE WILL NEED MORE AGRICULTURAL LANDjAND BY <br />USING IT UP, YOU- DON'T GET MORE, HE BELIEVED THAT MOBILE HOME <br />ZONING IN THAT AREA CREATES A GREATER CONCENTRATION THAN THE <br />COUNTY CAN SUPPORT <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE WISHED TO MAKE IT -CLEAR TO EVERYONE <br />THAT -HIS -VOTE WOULD NOT BE INFLUENCED IN ANY WAY BECAUSE OF THE <br />POSSIBILITY OF A SITE FOR A FIRE STATION ON THIS PROPERTY. HE <br />THEN _DISCUSSED THE TAXES- PAID BY MOBILE HOME OWNERS, NOTING THAT <br />IT IS THE LEGISLATURE THAT HAS DIRECTED THAT IT IS ONLY NECESSARY <br />THAT THEY BUY A LICENSE PLATE, $46.80 FOR A SINGLE WIDE OR $92.50 <br />FOR A DOUBLE WIDE, AND THESE FUNDS GO TO THE STATE WITH NOT THE <br />FIRST PENNY COMING BACK TO THIS COUNTY. HE DID NOT FEEL THE AMOUNT <br />OF TAXES IS A REASON TO VOTE AGAINST THIS ISSUE, BUT THAT IT IS A <br />REASON TO LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF MOBILE HOMES WE SHOULD ALLOW IN THE <br />COUNTY, COMMISSIONER WODTKE DID NOT FEEL THAT -THE OPPOSITION HERE <br />TODAY IS AGAINST THE LAND GOING FROM AGRICULTURAL TO SOME TYPE OF <br />RESIDENTIAL, BUT THAT IT WAS MORE IN OPPOSITION TO MOBILE HOME PARKS, <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS CALLED FOR THE QUESTION ON THE MOTION TO <br />DENY THE REZONING TO R -IMP. COMMISSIONERS FLETCHER, SCURLOCK AND <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS VOTED IN FAVOR, AND COMMISSIONERS WODTKE AND BIRD <br />VOTED IN OPPOSITION. THE MOTION TO DENY CARRIED 3 TO Z. <br />. ATTORNEY HERZOG POINTED OUT THAT THERE ALSO WAS A REQUEST <br />FOR C-1 ZONING. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER FLETCHER, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE, TO DENY THE REQUESTED REZONING TO C-1 AS <br />ADVERTISED BECAUSE THIS PROJECT WAS PRESENTED AS ONE LARGE <br />CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE FOUR ACRES OF <br />COMMERCIAL WAS TO BE PRIMARILY FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE MOBILE <br />HOME PARK; THERE IS, THEREFORE, NOW NO NEED FOR THE COMMERCIAL <br />ZONING. <br />L..J <br />