Laserfiche WebLink
MAY 2 01981 = <br />o�K �t{GE <br />THE BOARD OF COUNTY -COMMISSIONERS RECESSED FOR LUNCH AT <br />12:00 -NOON AND RECONVENED-W-I-TH-THE SAME MEMBERS PRESENT AT 1:40 O'CLOCK- <br />P,h1,. DEPUTY CLERK VIRGINIA HARGREAVES TOOK OVER FROM DEPUTY CLERK <br />JANICE CALDW-ELL FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING, <br />DISCUSSION 'RE -DEFERRED- PAYMENT PLAN — GIFFORD SEWER & WATER SYSTEM - <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK STATED THAT $INCE THE COMMISSION HAD <br />IND ICATED.INTEREST IN -PROVIDING AN -EASIER PAYMENT SCHEDULE .FOR CONNECTING <br />TO THE GIFFORD SEWER AND WATER SY-STEM,-HE DISCUSSED_THIS WITH -THE <br />- - ADVISORY -COMMITTEE AND.HAS COME UP WITH THE FOLLOWING MEMO, WHICH IS <br />SELF—EXPLANATORY: <br />TO: The Honorable Members of -DATE: May 13,--1981- .FILE: <br />the Board of County Commissioners <br />SUBJECT: "Contract for allowing payment <br />of Impact Fees over a period of <br />18 months or 24 months <br />FROiVi: Doug Scurlock, Chair REFERENCES: Memo "Action toward Board, Item <br />Gifford Water and Sewer 7D from Meeting of April 7, 1981", <br />Advisory Committee Liner to Nelson dated 4-8-81 - with <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />On the evening of 5/11/81, the Gifford Water and Sewer Advisory Committee <br />met at 7:00 P.M. in the Library of the Middle 7 School. Discussion centered <br />around the attached reference -memo and how the procedure will work. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />The proposed contract arrangement suggests the minimum down payment of <br />$50.00. The committee discussed a proposed down -payment of 50% or a minimum <br />of about $210.00. The concensus agreed that this amount needed for cash in <br />advance of service would defeat the purpose of the "easy payment plan". It <br />was felt that the County has financial protection to the contract with provision <br />to terminate the service if the payment is not on schedule and paid concurrently <br />with the water usage. )_ <br />The referenced plan further suggests that the contract should not be made <br />available to landlords. After discussion, we agreed that it would be feasible <br />to have landlords avail themselves of the contract procedure with the following <br />conditions: <br />That is the landlord must pay for both the water service and the contract until <br />the contract is fully paid. After that he wouid be free to have the account <br />switched to the tenant's name (only if each unit is metered). There must be <br />a meter for at least each building. <br />The interest in having landlords to be eligible is because there is a large <br />quantity of existing taps that can service these units that have been installed <br />with the Phase I pipeline work. It was felt that this contract plan may help <br />get more of those units onto the system and eliminate the use of wells that are <br />possibly polluted. <br />-- LIP <br />