My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/21/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
5/21/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:17 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:08:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/21/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- PLANNING DIRECTOR. METTHEN PRESENTED THE FOANG <br />ALTERNATIVES: <br />1) APPROVE THE REZONING AS ADVER-TISED FOR THE 316 ACRES TO R -2B, '. <br />OR 8 UNITS PER ACRE, TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF 2,560 UNITS. <br />2) DENY THE ADVERTISED REZONING. THE 316 ACRES THEN WOULD REMAIN IN <br />R-2 AT 15 UNITS PER ACRE AND ALLOW A MAXIMUM OF 4,740 MULTIPLE <br />FAMILY UNITS. <br />3) APPROVE REZONING TO AN R -1A SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT WITH 4.3 UNITS <br />PER ACRE TO ALLOW A MAXIMUM DENSITY OF 1,459 UNITS. <br />4) APPROVE REZONING TO R -2D MULTIPLE FAMILY, WHICH WOULD ALLOW 6 <br />UNITS PER ACRE, OR 1,896 MAXIMUM DENSITY. THE PLANNING STAFF REC- <br />OMMENDS THIS ALTERNATIVE. <br />MR. REVER THEN WENT INTO CONSIDERABLE DETAIL TRYING TO <br />EXPLAIN THE COMPLICATED SITUATION WHICH OCCURRED AT THE PLANNING & <br />ZONING COMMISSION MEETING, LEADING TO THEIR FORWARDING TWO RECOMMENDA- <br />TIONS, ONE APPROVING THE REZONING TO R -2B AND THE OTHER RECOMMENDING <br />THAT THE BOARD CONSIDER REZONING THE TRACT TO R -1A SINGLE FAMILY, <br />MR. REVER NOTED THERE WAS SOME CONFUSION IN REGARD TO THE NECESSITY <br />FOR THE PLANNING & ZONING -COMMISSION TO HAVE TO CONSIDER THE ORIGINAL <br />PROPOSAL-FOR.REZONING TO R -2B AND ALSO FOR THEM TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERA- <br />TION THE FACT THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PRESENTLY BEING FORMULATED <br />HAS A PROPOSED LD -1 CATEGORY FOR A--DENSITY.OF 3 UNITS PER ACRE. THE <br />-MAJORITY OF THE BOARD DECIDED IT WAS NECESSARY TO VOTE ON THE SPECIFIC <br />PROPOSAL AND DID SO BY VOTING 3 TO 2 IN FAVOR OF THE REZONING TO R -2B. <br />THEIR SECOND -RECOMMENDATION, ALSO BY A 3 TO 2 VOTE, WAS FOR A CONSID- <br />ERATION OF R -1A SINGLE FAMILY, WHICH IS THE ONLY CATEGORY THEY COULD <br />-COME .UP WITH WHICH WOULD BE CLOSE TO THE LD -1 -BEING CONSIDERED FOR <br />THE PROPOSED MASTER PLAN.. MR.- REVERS I-NTERPRETATION OF THIS SECOND <br />RECOMMENDATION WAS THAT THE BOARD WAS NOT SPEAKING SPECIFICALLY TO <br />R -IA, BUT.RATHER TR-YING_TO STRESS THEIR PREFERENCE FOR A LOWER DENSITY <br />THAN THE R -2B. HE REITERATED THAT THE PLANNING STAFF STILL MAINTAINS - <br />THAT THE PROPER.ZONING WOULD BE R -2D, AND HE BELIEVED THIS IS SUPPORTED <br />BY THE -FINAL RECOMMENDATION:OF THE PLANNING &-ZONING COMMISSION THAT <br />THIS BE LOOKED AT JOR A DENSITY OF. 6 UNITS PER ACRE. <br />3 <br />800x 46. pAcE 562 <br />MAY 211981 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.