2008-186 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Exhibit 1 Scope of Services Indian River County Department of Utility Services Professional Service Support to Address Comments of the Request for Additional Information #3 dated December 13, 2007 for CUP Application No. 10524 Background In our statement of work for Amendment Number 1 to Work Order 2, we included Task 5: Follow -Up to Additional Requests from the Water Management District. This task allowed for the following: PBS&J proposes to provide the County with assistance in addressing up to two additional requests from the Water Management District with regards to the pending CUP. This task assumes up to three weeks per request for accumulation of necessary information, preparation in submittal format and attendance at up to two meetings with the District and two additional meetings with the County. We had budgeted $17,606 for the effort described above. We have reviewed the letter dated December 13, 2007 from the St. Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD), requesting additional information in support of the County's CUP. SJRWMD provided six additional questions with regards to the CUP application. We spoke with the County on January 9, 2008 with regards to the efforts necessary to answer the six questions and deferred discussion on question 6 (modeling) until after the teleconference scheduled for January 22, 2008 by SJRWMD. Subsequent to that call, we determined that the work needed to respond to the RAI would exceed the allowance made in our statement of work. This scope of work identifies the additional work necessary to complete the response to RAI #3. We have identified the work necessary and an estimated fee. At the end of the scope of work, we identify that portion that would be greater than the $17,606 budgeted and mentioned previously. Question 1: Revision of Well Table to include S7 and the County's monitoring wells, including a map. ($2,489) We agreed that this would be completed by PBS&J, with some input from the County. Question 2: Water Audit Revision and Water Conservation Plan The County has indicated that they will be updating both the audit and the water conservation plan. PBS&J understands that the response to this question will be provided in final format to PBS&J for submittal and no PBS&J efforts are needed. Question 3: Water Disposal and Reuse The County has indicated that they will be responding to this question in its entirety, and will provide said response in final format to PBS&J for submittal and no PBS&J efforts are needed. Question 4: Wellfield Management Plan ($6,740) PBS&J will amend the wellfield management plan to include information derived in the modeling (question 6). This effort will require coordination with County staff and