My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/3/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
6/3/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:17 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:09:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/03/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TOM LOCKWOOD, RESIDENT OF VERO BEACH, TOLD THE BOARD THAT <br />HIS COMPANY HAD THREE MINING PERMITS: GRAVE.S BROTHERS, MR. CHATHAM, <br />AND HOBART BROTHERS. HE FELT THE BOARD SHOULD CONSIDER THE LENGTH OF <br />TIME IT HAS TAKEN TODAY TO REVIEW THE 24 PAGES OF THE PROPOSED <br />ORDINANCE AS AN INDICATION OF THE AMOUNT OF DETAILS INVOLVED, AS <br />COMPARED TO THE CURRENT ORDINANCE OF ONLY TWO PAGES. MR. LOCKWOOD <br />SUGGESTED THAT IT MIGHT BE BENEFICIAL TO HAVE AN INDIVIDUAL GO THROUGH <br />THE ENTIRE PROCESS CONTAINED IN THE PROPOSED MINING ORDINANCE. HE <br />FELT IT WAS A VERY COMPLICATED PROCEDURE PLUS THE COST HAD NOT YET <br />BEEN ADDRESSED. MR, LOCKWOOD WONDERED IF THEY WERE REALLY CORRECTING <br />OR CREATING A PROBLEM AND FELT THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED AT A <br />WORKSHOP MEETING. <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD STATED HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE A CERTIFIED <br />ENGINEER GO THROUGH THE ENTIRE PROCESS AND ESTABLISH WHAT IT WOULD <br />COST. <br />MR. LOCKWOOD INTERJECTED THAT THE COMMITTEE WORKED LONG AND <br />HARD ON THIS PROJECT AND IT HAD TAKEN A GREAT DEAL OF TIME,_BUT HE <br />DID NOT THINK THE JOB WAS FINISHED YET. HE REITERATED THAT SOMEONE <br />SHOULD GO THROUGH THE PROCESS ONE TIME AS AN EXERCISE TO SEE IF IT <br />WOULD WORK, <br />WILLIAM KOOLAGE, INTERESTED CITIZEN, EXPRESSED HIS DIS- <br />APPOINTMENT, AND COMMENTED THAT THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED IN <br />A WORKSHOP WHERE ALL THE DETAILS COULD HAVE BEEN STUDIED BY THE <br />BOARD. HE ADDED THAT THE INFORMATION SHOULD BE DIGESTED AND THEN <br />ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING SHOULD BE HELD AFTER THE DETAILS ARE FULLY <br />UNDERSTOOD. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SCURLOCK, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. <br />THE BOARD DECIDED, AFTER QUITE A LENGTHY AND DETAILED <br />DISCUSSION, THAT A WORKSHOP WAS NECESSARY BEFORE REACHING A DECISION, <br />AND THAT MANY REVISIONS TO THE MINING ORDINANCE WOULD HAVE TO BE <br />MADE, SUCH AS: <br />JUN 3 7981 55 Boa 46 PAGE 625 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.