Laserfiche WebLink
ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE CHAIRMAN OUTLINED HIS <br />POSITION, WHICH IS THAT THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION SHOULD CONTINUE <br />TO REVIEW SITE PLANS, AND IF ANY COME UP FOR APPROVAL AND ARE READY <br />AND COMPLETE, THEN THEY SHOULD BE ACTED ON PRIOR TO THE MORATORIUM. <br />COMMISSIONER BIRD DID NOT FEEL THAT WE ARE VERY FAR APART, <br />BUT HE FELT THE BROADENED MORATORIUM HE HAD SUGGESTED REPRESENTED A <br />MORE REASONABLE ACROSS-THE-BOARD APPROACH AND WISHED TO KNOW WHAT <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK DID NOT LIKE ABOUT IT. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK STATED THAT THE ATTORNEY WAS NOT COMFORT- <br />ABLE WITH IT, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT THE INTENT OF THE <br />MORATORIUM IS TO ALLOW TIME TO COMPLETE THE LAND USE PLAN. HE FELT IF <br />YOU WERE'TO PUT IN AN EXCLUSION AND HAVE THE MORATORIUM ONLY APPLY TO <br />DENSITIES OVER A CERTAIN AMOUNT, IT MIGHT CAUSE A PROBLEM. HE DID NOT <br />KNOW WHETHER OR NOT THE MORATORIUM COULD BE EFFECTED AT A THRESHOLD <br />LEVEL. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE AGAIN BROUGHT UP THE -VESTED INTERESTS <br />AND THE VARIANCE PROCEDURE, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE PURPOSE <br />OF HAVING THE VARIANCE IN THE ORDINANCE IS THAT IT MAKES THE ORDINANCE <br />MORE SUPPORTABLE; IT GIVES THE BOARD AN OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS PARTICULAF <br />PROBLEMS AND TO TAKE SOME REMEDY THEY FEEL IS APPROPRIATE. THE BURDEN <br />IS TO SHOW THE HARDSHIP, AND PART OF THAT WILL BE THE VESTING ISSUE. <br />IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE HEARING ON THE <br />MORATORIUM SHOULD BE ADVERTISED FOR THE EARLIEST DATE LEGALLY POSSIBLE. <br />A SPECIAL CALLED MEETING FOR JUNE 30TH WAS DISCUSSED AND AGREED UPON <br />IF LEGALLY FEASIBLE. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. <br />THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, ON LOTION MADE, SECONDED <br />AND CARRIED, THE BOARD ADJOURNED AT 8:40 O'CLOCK P.M. <br />ATTEST: <br />CLERK <br />11 <br />I <br />sooK <br />PAGE'"'.' <br />