My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/10/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
6/10/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:17 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:09:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/10/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUN 101981 PmK 46 mu 666 <br />ATTORNEY MICHAEL O'HAIRE NOTED THAT THERE HAS BEEN A RAFT OF <br />SITE PLAN APPROVAL APPLICATIONS LATELY, AND THERE IS NO REASON TO <br />EXPECT THERE WILL NOT BE MORE COMING IN, PERHAPS AT EVEN HIGHER DENSI- <br />TIES HIS INTERPRETATION OF WHAT THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE SAID TONIGHT <br />WAS THAT 4/5 OF THE MEMBERS, GIVEN THIS POSSIBILITY, WOULD FAVOR AN <br />EMERGENCY MORATORIUM AND LIMITING DENSITY TO 6 UNITS PER ACRE HE <br />POINTED OUT THAT WHEN AN EMERGENCY MORATORIUM IS IN EFFECT, THE BOARD <br />COULD PROCEED TO ENACT A REGULAR MORATORIUM SO THAT ALL BETS ARE COVERED. <br />MR. O'HAIRE URGED THAT A CAP OF 6 BE SET ON AN EMERGENCY BASIS. AS TO <br />THE VESTING ANGLE, HE WAS NOT CONVINCED THAT THERE ARE ALL THAT MANY <br />PROPERTY OWNERS WHO HAVE VESTED RIGHTS, IN ADDITION, HE NOTED THERE <br />IS THE NORTH BEACH REZONING MATTER, WHICH HE ASSUMED IS COMING UP LATER <br />THIS EVENING, <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS NOTED THAT IT HAD BEEN MENTIONED EARLIER THAT <br />THE REZONING WOULD FOLLOW REGULAR CHANNELS THROUGH THE PLANNING & ZONING <br />COMMISSION AND WOULD NOT BE HEARD TONIGHT. <br />ATTORNEY STEVE HENDERSON CAME FORWARD REPRESENTING FLORIDA <br />LAND COMPANY. HE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THEY FILED THEIR INITIAL SITE <br />PLAN ON RIVER BEND IN AUGUST OF LAST YEAR, AND IT INCLUDED THE MASTER <br />PLAN FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT, THEY THEN INCURRED A RATHER LONG DELAY <br />IN GETTING SITE PLAN REVIEW. THE POINT IS THAT WHILE THEIR MASTER <br />PLAN WAS IN PROCESS, THERE WERE NO FIRM RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE PLANNING <br />& ZONING BOARD; THERE WAS NO THREAT OF A MORATORIUM AND NO THREAT OF <br />REZONING; AND FLORIDA LAND COMPANY HAS EXPENDED CONSIDERABLE MONEY ON <br />THE SITE PLAN. THEY PRESENTLY HAVE AN APPROVED SITE PLAN ON 2.8 ACRES, <br />WHICH HE DID NOT BELIEVE WOULD BE INVOLVED IN THE MORATORIUM; HOWEVER, <br />BECAUSE THIS SITE PLAN IS ON AN INTERIOR PORTION OF THEIR OVERALL <br />DEVELOPMENT PLAN, WHICH HAS ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED AND APPROVED, IF <br />THE BOARD SHOULD FAIL TO EXEMPT RIVER BEND, ATTORNEY HENDERSON STATED <br />IT WOULD AFFECT THE SITE PLAN ALREADY APPROVED, WHICH IS AN INTEGRAL <br />PART OF THE WHOLE. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS WISHED THE RECORD TO SHOW THAT THE BOARD DOES <br />NOT APPROVE CONCEPTUAL PLANS. <br />L <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.