Laserfiche WebLink
Indian River County, Florida <br />Management's Discussion and Analysis <br />For the Year Ended September 30, 2010 <br />Debt Administration - Long-term debt <br />At the end of the current fiscal year, the County had total bonded debt outstanding of $113.0 million. Of <br />this amount, $44.5 million is debt backed by the full faith and credit of the government. The revenue <br />bonds represent bonds secured solely by specified revenue sources. <br />Indian River County's Outstanding Debt <br />General Obligation and Revenue Bonds <br />(In Millions) <br />The County received an increase in all of their bond ratings with the recalibration of the bond rating <br />system. The County's General Obligation underlying rating from Standard & Poor's is "AAA" and <br />"AA" on the Revenue Bonds. Standard & Poor's rating is required on all issues. A second rating from <br />Fitch or Moody's is also required. <br />Additional information on the County's long-term debt can be found in Note 13 on pages 74-85 of this <br />report. <br />ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR'S BUDGETS AND RATES <br />In response to declining property values, sales tax and various other County revenues, the Board's <br />departments, Constitutional Officers, and outside agencies were asked to trim their budgets substantially <br />from the previous year. Many cost savings initiatives have been proposed in order to account for the <br />revenue reductions. Some of these include management reorganizations, staffing reductions, operating <br />expense decreases, contract renegotiations, minimal reductions of services and programs, and reduced <br />non-profit funding. In summary, staff has undertaken a critical review of all functions to streamline <br />operations as much as possible without impacting service levels. The tax roll in the General Fund <br />decreased by 10.4% due to continued falling real estate values. The total proposed budget is a decrease <br />of $258,855,120 or 27.9%. <br />13 <br />Governmental <br />Business -type <br />Activities <br />Activities <br />Total <br />General Obligation Debt: <br />2010 <br />2009 <br />2010 2009 <br />2010 <br />2009 <br />General Obligation, Series 2001 $ <br />5.2$ <br />6.0 $ <br />- $ - $ <br />5.2$ <br />6.0 <br />General Obligation Ref., Series 2003 <br />- <br />1.2 <br />- - <br />- <br />1.2 <br />Limited General Oblig., Series 2006 <br />39.3 <br />42.1 <br />- - <br />39.3 <br />42.1 <br />Revenue Bonds: <br />Spring Training Facility, Series 2001 <br />12.3 <br />12.9 <br />- - <br />12.3 <br />12.9 <br />Recreational Revenue Ref., Series 2003 <br />- <br />- <br />3.1 3.7 <br />3.1 <br />3.7 <br />Water and Sewer Ref. Rev., Series 1993A <br />- <br />- <br />1.6 3.0 <br />1.6 <br />3.0 <br />Water and Sewer Ref. Rev., Series 2005 <br />- <br />- <br />22.7 24.1 <br />22.7 <br />24.1 <br />Water and Sewer Ref. Rev., Series 2009 <br />- <br />- <br />28.8 29.0 <br />28.8 <br />29.0 <br />Total $ <br />56.8$ <br />62.2 $ <br />56.2$ 59.8 $ <br />113.0$ <br />122.0 <br />The County received an increase in all of their bond ratings with the recalibration of the bond rating <br />system. The County's General Obligation underlying rating from Standard & Poor's is "AAA" and <br />"AA" on the Revenue Bonds. Standard & Poor's rating is required on all issues. A second rating from <br />Fitch or Moody's is also required. <br />Additional information on the County's long-term debt can be found in Note 13 on pages 74-85 of this <br />report. <br />ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR'S BUDGETS AND RATES <br />In response to declining property values, sales tax and various other County revenues, the Board's <br />departments, Constitutional Officers, and outside agencies were asked to trim their budgets substantially <br />from the previous year. Many cost savings initiatives have been proposed in order to account for the <br />revenue reductions. Some of these include management reorganizations, staffing reductions, operating <br />expense decreases, contract renegotiations, minimal reductions of services and programs, and reduced <br />non-profit funding. In summary, staff has undertaken a critical review of all functions to streamline <br />operations as much as possible without impacting service levels. The tax roll in the General Fund <br />decreased by 10.4% due to continued falling real estate values. The total proposed budget is a decrease <br />of $258,855,120 or 27.9%. <br />13 <br />