My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-252A (03)
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2010
>
2010-252A (03)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 4:33:46 PM
Creation date
10/5/2015 10:01:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
10/12/2010
Control Number
2010-252A (3)
Agenda Item Number
10.A.3
Entity Name
Comprehensive Plan
Subject
EAR based Amendments 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 4 Transportation Element
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
13455
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element <br />• Model Validation <br />Prior to its use as a tool for projecting needs, the Indian River County traffic model was validated <br />using 2000 base year data. The traffic model is the Florida Standard Urban Transportation Model <br />Structure (FSUTMS) traffic model that, when run with the Indian River County highway <br />network and socioeconomic data as inputs, predicts future traffic on area roads for desired <br />projection years. <br />In validating the traffic model, Census records, state labor department employment statistics, and <br />other sources to estimate Indian River County's population and employment data for 2000 were <br />used. The 2000 data were then projected through 2030. These data are summarized in Table <br />4.6. The socioeconomic data were then used in the model validation process and in the <br />prediction of future traffic levels for the long range plan needs analysis. <br />The 2030 socioeconomic data projections used in the travel demand forecasting model were <br />based on the County's future land use map. Using the map as a control, the MPO projected <br />single and multi family dwelling units, hotel/motel units, school enrollment, and employment for <br />2030 by traffic analysis zones. <br />While this methodology is standard, the results do not reflect the impact of some of the land use <br />initiatives incorporated within this plan. To the extent that traditional neighborhood <br />development (TND) projects are built, other mixed use projects are developed, land uses are <br />connected, bike/ped facilities are built, and transit service is enhanced, the model results may <br />overestimate the number of vehicle trips that the socioeconomic data projections suggest. <br />Overall, the model validation process involved running the FSUTMS model to obtain predicted <br />2000 roadway traffic volumes and then comparing those model -predicted roadway volumes to <br />actual 2000 field -collected traffic counts. Based upon the comparison of predicted to observed <br />volumes, minor changes were made to the model's parameters. This change in parameters <br />allowed the model to approximate predicted roadway volumes to actual roadway volumes. <br />Through this process, an acceptable projected -to -actual ratio was obtained. With this process <br />complete, the model was then considered valid for the purpose of predicting future traffic levels <br />using future -year socioeconomic data projections. <br />• Needs Analysis <br />The validated model was then run using 2030 socioeconomic data and the existing and <br />committed road network. This model run was performed to develop 2030 traffic demand <br />projections under the assumption that no capacity -producing roadway improvements would be <br />made from 2010 to 2030. In other words, this model run assessed the impact of 20 years of <br />growth on the existing and committed roadway network. This model run also identified roadway <br />deficiencies resulting from the growth in travel demand over this 20 -year time period. A <br />deficient roadway is defined as any roadway having a level of service condition that exceeds the <br />adopted roadway performance standard. With this process, all deficient roadways became <br />candidates for potential future road widening projects and were tested to determine whether <br />Community Development Department Indian River County 56 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.