Laserfiche WebLink
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER, TO DENY THE REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL <br />EXTENSION, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR. <br />CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, AND IT WAS DETERMINED <br />THAT NO DEPOSIT HAD BEEN RECEIVED FOR THE WATER AND SEWER ALLOCATION. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON ADVISED THAT ATTORNEY CHARLES HARRIS, <br />REPRESENTING N & B REALTY, WAS AWARE THAT THIS ITEM WAS ON THE AGENDA, <br />BUT HE HAD NO RESPONSE FROM THE ATTORNEY OR OWNER. HE SUGGESTED <br />DEFERRING THE ITEM UNTIL THIS AFTERNOON TO SEE IF ATTORNEY HARRIS <br />COULD BE PRESENT. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK WITHDREW HIS MOTION, AND COMMISSIONER <br />FLETCHER WITHDREW HIS SECOND. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />FLETCHER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO TABLE THE MATTER UNTIL <br />THIS AFTERNOON. <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REVIEWED THE DFFERRED COMPENSATION <br />PLAN WITH THE BOARD AS FOLLOWS: <br />JUN 171991 25 BOCK 16 FNE 696 <br />