My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-252A (09)
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2010
>
2010-252A (09)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 4:38:33 PM
Creation date
10/5/2015 10:01:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
10/12/2010
Control Number
2010-252A (9)
Agenda Item Number
10.A.3
Entity Name
Comprehensive Plan
Subject
EAR based Amendment 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 8 Conservation Element
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
13461
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprehensive Plan Conservation Element <br />o Indian River Lagoon <br />Between 1996 and 2007, Indian River Lagoon water quality remained fairly constant. Within the <br />lagoon, water quality is measured at various points. At each point, water quality generally fluctuates <br />within established ranges. Recently, water quality at several water monitoring stations showed <br />improvement. This improvement may be the result of several recent water quality projects, including <br />muck dredging in the St. Sebastian River; construction of sub -regional stormwater treatment facilities <br />in Vero Lake Estates, Gifford and Roseland; and improved sedimentation and erosion control practices <br />through County implementation of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Act. <br />Once completed, several projects that are currently under construction will contribute even more to <br />water quality improvement. These projects include the Egret Marsh and Spoonbill Marsh water <br />treatment projects, as well as the Main Relief Canal Pollution Control Facility. <br />In 1996, the portion of the Indian River Lagoon from approximately Grand Harbor south to the south <br />county line was a "Class III" waterbody. In 2008, the portion of the lagoon from the northern tip of <br />Round Island south to the south county line was upgraded to a "Class 11" waterbody. At the same time, <br />water quality was downgraded from "Class II" to "Class III" from the North Relief Canal south to the <br />northern limits of the city of Vero Beach. <br />The slight increase in water quality in the lagoon indicates that water quality improvement projects are <br />having a positive effect. For that reason, the County should consider construction of pollution control <br />facilities in the North and South Relief canals, using series screening methodology similar to the Main <br />Relief canal project. In that vein, the County should continue its policy of seeking funds through <br />Section 319 Grants, Snook Tag grants, the Surface Water Improvement Management (SWIM) program, <br />and other funding sources for stormwater management and pollution control projects that benefit <br />lagoon water quality. <br />In the future, the County should analyze water quality measurements taken throughout the Indian River <br />Lagoon to assess the specific effects that water improvement projects are having. Going forward, the <br />county should work with other agencies, not only to monitor water quality results, but also to identifij <br />new water quality improvement project sites. <br />In 1990, the County adopted land development regulations requiring shoreline protection buffers along <br />the St. Sebastian River and along the aquatic preserves in the Indian River Lagoon. The regulations <br />prohibit development, excepti for docks, boat ramps, pervious walkways and elevated walkways which <br />provide riparian access for landowners, within the protection buffers. Since 1990, the shoreline buffers <br />have been applied to all parcels along the rivers, even those parcels that are platted lots with seawalls <br />and no pre-existing shoreline vegetation. In the future, the County should continue its policy of <br />requiring shoreline protection buffers, but should consider exempting existing platted lots with seawalls <br />from the requirement, since applying the buffer in such circumstances does not serve the intent of the <br />regulation. <br />Community Development Department Indian River County 96 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.