My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-252A (09)
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2010
>
2010-252A (09)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 4:38:33 PM
Creation date
10/5/2015 10:01:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
10/12/2010
Control Number
2010-252A (9)
Agenda Item Number
10.A.3
Entity Name
Comprehensive Plan
Subject
EAR based Amendment 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 8 Conservation Element
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
13461
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprehensive Plan Conservation Element <br />enforce its Wetlands and Deepwater Habitat Protection ordinance (LDR Chapter 928) discussed in <br />the preceding section. <br />o Intergovernmental Coordination <br />Since Indian River County supports efforts by the FDEP and the SJRWMD to minimize the amount <br />of jurisdictional agency overlap regarding permitting and enforcement, the County's Environmental <br />Planning Section (EPS) offers "in-kind" assistance to jurisdictional reviewing agencies. In doing so, <br />the EPS serves in an advisory capacity by reviewing mitigation proposals, reporting wetland <br />violations, and providing information pertaining to properties located throughout the County. <br />For wetland boundary determinations, the EPS defers to the appropriate jurisdictional reviewing <br />agencies. In the future, the EPS should continue to review all proposed mitigation plans and make <br />recommendations on a development -by -development basis. Furthermore, the County's policy should <br />be to continue requiring wetland resource permits for any proposed development project that impacts <br />a wetland. When proposed wetland impacts are less than state or federal thresholds and do not <br />require permits, the County should continue to reserve the right to require wetland mitigation where <br />appropriate. <br />o Wetland Conservation Land Use and Zoning <br />Currently, the Future Land Use Map of the comprehensive plan depicts two conservation land use <br />designations for wetlands: the Public Lands Conservation District (C-1) and the Estuarine Wetlands <br />Conservation District (C-2). Con -1 and Con -2 are the comparable zoning districts for the C-1 and C- <br />2 land use designations, respectively. While the C-1/Con-1 designation applies to both upland and <br />wetland conservation lands under public ownership, the C-2/Con-2 designation applies only to <br />privately -owned estuarine wetlands found along the Indian River Lagoon and the lower reaches of <br />the St. Sebastian River. Development density within the C-1/Con-1 designation is 0 units per acre. <br />Within C-2/Con-2 designated areas, the allowed development density is 1 unit per 40 acres. <br />In accordance with LDR Section 911.12, all developments located in a Con -2 zoning district must be <br />approved as a planned development (PD). For properties adjacent to the Indian River Lagoon or St. <br />Sebastian River, the location of any proposed development is contingent upon determination of the <br />jurisdictional boundaries of estuarine wetlands by site-specific survey. To minimize wetland <br />impacts, the County should continue to require clustering in Con -2 areas and allow density transfers <br />from the Con -2 zoning district to non -estuarine wetlands. Moreover, the County should continue to <br />prohibit density bonuses on land zoned -Con -2 and prohibit density transfer from off-site lands to PD <br />projects on lands zoned Con -2. <br />Community Development Department Indian River County 108 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.