Laserfiche WebLink
Comprehensive Plan Intergovernmental Coordination Element <br />the canal system will be piped to the headworks of the facility and then sheet flow over a large algal turf scrubber. Algae that grows on the <br />scrubber will remove pollutants from the water and be harvested and composted on a weekly basis in the summer and less often in the cooler <br />months. Then water that has flowed over the scrubber will be routed sequentially through 3 polishing ponds (initial intermediate and final) and <br />then pumped back into the canal system. The Indian River County's Main Relief Canal Pollution Central System Using Series Screening <br />Methodology to continuously remove solids to 1/16th inch diameter from 300 mgd of canal water. The project is being paid for and constructed <br />by Indian River County in the Indian River Farms Water Control District's right-of-way under an Interlocal Agreement between the county and <br />the IRFWCD main relief canal pollution control system. <br />Indian River Farms is not the only water control district with which the county must coordinate, and drainage is not the only county/water <br />control district intergovernmental coordination issue. <br />With the Fellsmere Farms Water Control District (FFWCD), an important issue is property access. Presently, there are many five and ten acre <br />parcels, created in the 1920's by the FFWCD's plat of reclamation, that have access only through ditch roads within FFWCD's canal and road <br />rights-of-way. These ditch roads are unpaved and unsafe. Consequently, there is a need for the county and FFWCD to coordinate to improve <br />these roads. <br />Overall, it is necessary that the county coordinate extensively with the water control districts. This coordination should involve addressing water <br />quality and water quantity aspects of new development projects, cooperating with road and canal right-of-way usage, and j ointly addressing long <br />term stormwater management system improvements. <br />With respect to land use, decisions in one jurisdiction can produce various types of impacts on infrastructure components such as water, sewer, <br />solid waste, drainage, and aquifer recharge in other jurisdictions. Such impacts could include: facility impacts (such as stormwater runoff from a <br />project in one jurisdiction affecting drainage canals in another, development in one jurisdiction affecting water and sewer capacity and <br />availability in another jurisdiction, or a drainage district's capacity or level of service standard limiting discharge rate for development projects in <br />a jurisdiction); aquifer recharge area impacts (such as development in one jurisdiction reducing aquifer recharge and consequently affecting <br />quantity and/or quality of groundwater in another area); and other types of impacts. <br />For adjacent counties, the St. Johns River Water Management District, the Department of Transportation, and the Department of Environmental <br />Protection, the principal relationships involve natural resource protection and Floridan aquifer recharge area protection. Because land use <br />decisions can have extra jurisdictional impacts, coordination among adjacent local governments and special districts is important. Therefore, <br />notification of affected governments, identification of expected impacts, establishment of ways to mitigate impacts, and development of a <br />process to resolve disputes are important. A policy for Joint Planning Areas (JPA) can address these issues. In the future, the county should <br />work with adjacent local governments to develop formal intergovernmental coordination agreements that address extra jurisdictional impacts. <br />Community Development Department Indian River County 3 2 <br />