My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/1/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
7/1/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:17 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:12:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/01/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />80-OK 46 FA nF 158 <br />MR, NICKENS-STATED THAT THE TAX ROLLS DO REFLECT THE PROPERTY <br />THAT IS PURCHASED WITH THE INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS, AND THE TAXES <br />ARE PAID JUST LIKE A MORTGAGE — THE TITLE NEVER TRANSFERS TO THE COUNTY <br />UNTIL THE BONDS ARE PAID. <br />MORE DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ABOUT THE CREATION OF AN AUTHORITY, <br />AND ATTORNEY COLLINS INDICATED THE STATUTES STATE THE BOARD MUST CREATE <br />THIS AUTHORITY BEFORE THE PROGRAM CAN PROCEED. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE INQUIRED WHO WERE GENERALLY THE BUYERS <br />OF THIS TYPE OF'BOND ISSUE. <br />MR, NICKENS ADVISED THAT THEY ARE USUALLY HANDLED BY THE <br />LOCAL BANKS IN CONJUNCTION WITH INSURANCE COMPANIES — THE BONDS ARE <br />ISSUED TAX FREE, DUE TO THE COUNTY'S EFFORT IN THE PROGRAM. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE THOUGHT RAMPMASTERS WAS A VERY GOOD <br />TYPE OF INDUSTRY FOR THE COUNTY TO. HAVE, AND FELT THE BOARD COULD SIT <br />AS AN AUTHORITY FOR A PERIOD OF TIME IF THERE WOULD NOT BE T00 MUCH <br />INVOLVEMENT. HE WANTED TO INDICATE TO RAMPMASTERS THAT THE BOARD WAS <br />RECEPTIVE TO THEM. <br />MR. NORTON STATED THAT MR. DAVIS HAD A BUYER FOR THEIR BONDS <br />AND THE BANK WAS READY TO TAKE OVER THEIR BOND ISSUE. AGAIN HE <br />URGED THE BOARD,TO ACT AS THE BONDING AUTHORITY AND GIVE A LETTER OF <br />INTENT TO RAMPMASTER SO THAT MR, DAVIS COULD BEGIN THE PROCESS OF <br />MOVING HIS FACILITY TO THIS COUNTY. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT THE BOARD'S FUNCTION WAS TO <br />DECLARE A NEED FOR THIS PROGRAM BY RESOLUTION, AND HE DID NOT THINK <br />THE BOARD WAS IN ANY POSITION TO GIVE ASSURANCE TO A BONDING COMPANY <br />NOW, BUT COULD INDICATE THEIR INTENTION. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK COMMENTED THAT HE DID NOT WANT TO <br />RUSH WHEN SOMETHING OF THIS MAGNITUDE WAS BEING CONSIDERED. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS— <br />SIONER SCURLOCK, FOR THE BOARD TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 81-44 TO MAKE A <br />DETERMINATION THAT THERE WAS A NEED FOR AN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT <br />AUTHORITY, THAT IT WAS THE BOARD'S INTENTION TO ACT AS THAT AUTHORITY, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.