My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-252A (17)
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2010
>
2010-252A (17)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2022 3:14:37 PM
Creation date
10/5/2015 10:00:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Report
Approved Date
10/12/2010
Control Number
2010-252A (17)
Agenda Item Number
10.A.3
Entity Name
Comprehensive Plan
Subject
EAR based Amendments 2030 Comprehensive Plan
Chapter 2 Future Land Use Element
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
13449
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 2.2. Historic Land Uses and Percent of Total Land Coverage <br />-7--19431 <br />19691 <br />19842 <br />Urban <br />3.27 <br />9.57 <br />11.47 <br />Agricultural <br />27.47 <br />46.72 <br />60.54 <br />Natural <br />69.25 <br />43.71 <br />27.99 <br />Sources: Land Uses in Indian River County, Florida; An Analysis; Louis C. Burney, 1970. <br />2 Mapping and Monitoring of Agricultural Lands; Department of Community <br />Affairs, 1984. <br />3 Some Urban Uses (Recreation, Idle, Refuge) reported in 1943, 1969 may be <br />classified in part as Agricultural or Natural uses in 1984. <br />4 Bare Soil 1984, 50% allocated to both Urban and Agricultural Groups. <br />PREVIOUS COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLANS <br />In the past, Indian River County has undertaken several comprehensive planning efforts. <br />Included among those efforts was a plan adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in <br />1982. The Land Use Element of the 1982 plan set forth objectives and standards for the <br />immediate and long-range development of the county. <br />In the 1982 plan, the two major land use objectives centered on urban services and incompatible <br />uses. According to that plan, higher intensity development was to be encouraged in areas which <br />contained or were programmed for urban services, while lower intensity development was to be <br />permitted in urban fringe areas and in environmentally sensitive areas. That plan also provided <br />for the separation of incompatible uses and encouraged the use of natural buffers. <br />In addition, the objectives of the Land Use Element provided a basis for establishing specific <br />land development regulation policies. With respect to commercial/industrial land uses, policies <br />were intended to discourage strip development and enhance the traffic handling capacity of local <br />roads through the use of compact activity areas. <br />On the other hand, agricultural policies were designed to prohibit urban encroachment into <br />agriculturally productive lands. As to development along fringe areas, that was to be permitted if <br />it was consistent with planned growth areas and the existing conditions in the immediate area of <br />the proposed development. <br />In the 1982 plan, open space and recreational policies were intended to preserve existing open <br />space and recreational areas, develop new open space and recreational areas, and maximize the <br />utilization of scenic and cultural facilities whenever possible. Residential land use policies in the <br />plan focused on regulating the density and location of residential neighborhoods to complement <br />Future Land Use Element 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.