My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/2/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
7/2/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:17 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:13:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/02/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUL 2 <br />1981 <br />kOK 46 <br />PA,E 794 <br />IN <br />THE ORDINANCE, <br />AND HAS COME A LONG WAY TO PROCEED TO DEVELOP <br />SEA OAKS - HE GAVE A BRIEF HISTORY CONCERNING THE PARCEL. ATTORNEY <br />STEWART-THEN ASKED THE BOARD TO CONSIDER GRANTING A SPECIAL EXCEPTION <br />TO MR. NUTT'S PROPERTY IN REGARD TO THE MORATORIUM. <br />FRANK LYNCH, ATTORNEY FROM FT. PIERCE REPRESENTING THE <br />DEVELOPER OF SEA OAKS PROJECT, APPROACHED THE BOARD, AND STRONGLY <br />OBJECTED TO A MORATORIUM. HE EXPLAINED THAT THE SEA OAKS PROJECT <br />IS A MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT OF 720 UNITS AND IS ON 25 ACRES EAST <br />OF AIA AND 100 ACRES WEST OF AIA AT 5.7 UNITS PER ACRE. HE POINTED <br />OUT THAT THIS BARELY EXCEEDS ONE-THIRD OF THE DENSITY ALLOWED THERE. <br />ATTORNEY LYNCH COMMENTED THAT HIS CLIENT WAS ACTING IN GOOD FAITH <br />AND THAT 50% OF THE VEGETATION WOULD REMAIN IN ITS NATURAL STATE. <br />HE STRESSED THAT THE BUILDINGS WOULD BE AN ASSET TO THIS COMMUNITY. <br />ATTORNEY LYNCH THEN -OUTLINED A SEQUENCE OF OCCURRENCES REGARDING THE <br />SITE PLAN AND OBJECTED FOR BEING REMOVED FROM THE JUNE 25, 1981 <br />PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA DUE TO "NEW DEFICIENCIES." HE <br />ADDED THAT THEY DID APPEAR AT THAT MEETING AND WERE PERMITTED TO VOICE <br />THEIR OBJECTION BUT NOT PERMITTED TO DISCUSS THE SITE PLAN. ATTORNEY <br />LYNCH ADVISED THEY WORKED OUT WHAT THE COUNTY HAD REQUESTED THEM TO <br />DO ON JUNGLE TRAIL. HE COMMENTED THAT THE TIME AND MONEY THAT HAS <br />GONE INTO THIS PROJECT WAS IN EXCESS OF $2.7 MILLION; AND THEY HAVE <br />ACTED IN GOOD FAITH. ATTORNEY LYNCH REFERRED TO A BINDING LETTER FROM <br />THE STATE OF FLORIDA DATED JUNE 21, 1981 WHERE IT WAS STATED THIS <br />PROJECT WOULD NOT CAUSE AN IMPACT. HE THEN REQUESTED THAT THE BOARD <br />NOT IMPOSE A MORATORIUM AT THIS TIME AND ALSO SUGGESTED THAT THE SITE <br />PLANS THAT ARE SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETED BE EXEMPTED. HE FELT THIS <br />WOULD BE FAIR IN RETURN FOR THE GOOD FAITH SHOWN .BY THE PROPERTY <br />OWNERS AND DEVELOPERS. <br />J. B. NORTON, EXECUTIVE OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, CAME <br />BEFORE THE BOARD TO POINT OUT WHAT MARTIN! COUNTY HAS DONE RECENTLY <br />WITH THEIR MORATORIUM - THEY HAN,!,E ALLOWED THOSE SSITE PLANS, WHICH HAVE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.