Laserfiche WebLink
INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PHASE 2 <br /> TECHNICAL ENERGY AUDIT <br /> RECOMMENDED ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES <br /> levels to obtain greater savings (the estimated improvement in light levels in most <br /> areas are in a range of 5 to 10% in comparison with the existing light levels). <br /> FPLES recommends that Indian River County moves forward to implement the lighting <br /> retrofit, as the ECM has the following savings and cost characteristics: <br /> 92mmended <br /> 280 4 333 1322 1178 $23,332 4.8 Yrs <br /> (Note: The detailed analyses and cut sheets for this ECM can be found in Appendix H& I) <br /> ECM - 2: Occupancy Sensors <br /> FPLES performed an analysis of the facility's lighting system with respect to the <br /> use of occupancy sensors. It showed that additional savings for the selected <br /> rooms can be achieved adding the sensors. This is based on a review of the <br /> facility's occupancy pattern, lighting usage and FPLES historical data. <br /> For this facility, multiple rooms were selected for the installation of occupancy <br /> sensors and/or time switches which resulted in additional 145 kWh in savings. The <br /> models being used are shown in the Appendix and are for the various rooms <br /> (storage rooms, mechanical rooms and electrical rooms). <br /> Occupancy sensors have an annual savings of$12, with $543 cost and simple payback of 35 years. <br /> Therefore, FPLES does not recommends that Indian River County moves forward to implement the <br /> occupancy sensors .The detailed analyses and cut sheets for this ECM can be found <br /> in Appendix H&I. <br /> ECM - 3: Water Conservation <br /> FPLES performed a walkdown of the facility's domestic water system with respect to <br /> installing low flow and ultra low flow fixtures. As a result, it was determined that savings <br /> can be achieved through the replacement and/or retrofit of water fixtures. The analysis included <br /> determining the consumption of the existing (pre) fixtures, comparing it to the baseline water bill (see <br /> Modeling Methods, Section 3) and determining the consumption of the retrofit (post) fixtures. Once <br /> the post and pre consumption were determined, the savings were calculated based on the current <br /> water/sewer rates. <br /> The identified high water consumption faucets and urinals should be replaced at this facility. The <br /> field investigation identified 18 restroom fixtures at the facility. After completion of the analysis, 10 <br /> replacement fixtures were proposed in the water conservation project shown below: <br />