Laserfiche WebLink
BOOK �� FACE 32 <br />AUG 5 1981 <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON SUGGESTED THAT INSTEAD OF READING <br />THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION BIOLOGICAL AND <br />WATER QUALITY AND ASSESSMENT REPORT INTO THE RECORD, A FULL PRESENTATION <br />BE MADE ON AUGUST 19TH OF THE INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD PROJECT. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED. <br />ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY HOULIHAN COMMENTED THAT IN <br />REVIEWING THE MINUTES, THERE WAS SOME UNCERTAINTY CONCERNING THIS <br />REPORT. HE ADVISED THAT THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS TO OBTAIN A <br />PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT IS THAT THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT MUST APPROVE <br />THE REPORT, AND IN THE PROCESS OF APPROVING THE PROJECT, A REPORT <br />OF THIS NATURE MUST BE READ INTO THE RECORD. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE REPORTED THAT THE BOARD HAD HIRED <br />CONSULTANTS TO WORK -ON THIS PROJECT AND TO GET PERMITS TO BUILD THE <br />ROAD. TO SAY THAT THE BOARD HAS NOT APPROVED INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD <br />WAS AN ASININE STATEMENT, HE EMPHATICALLY STATED. COMMISSIONER: WODTKE <br />THEN ASKED IF THE BOARD WAS SITTING THERE SAYING THAT WE HAVE N.OT <br />APPROVED INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD BEING BUILT? <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER STATED HE WAS. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK STATED HE WAS. <br />LOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER BIRD, THAT THE BOARD GO ON RECORD STATING THAT INDIAN RIVER <br />BOULEVARD IS TO BE BUILT AS PLANNED AND THAT THEY CONTINUE PROCEEDING <br />WITH THE PROJECT. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK MENTIONED THAT HE HAD ADDITIONAL <br />INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PROJECT, AND SINCE HE WAS A NEW COMMIS- <br />SIONER, HE DID NOT NECESSARILY APPROVE IT AND WOULD NOT STAND FOR <br />HAVING IT RAMMED DOWN HIS THROAT. HE CONTINUED THAT THE BOARD HAS <br />NEVER STATED TO THE PUBLIC THAT THIS ROAD WILL BE A MAJOR ARTERY - <br />JUST DISCUSSION ABOUT RESPONSE TIME FOR AMBULANCES GOING TO THE NEW <br />HOSPITAL. <br />