My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/5/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
8/5/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2020 11:53:13 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:36:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/05/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
156
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OOM PAGE <br />AUG 5198 B 16 <br />THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS <br />TO THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF JULY 2, 1981. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL <br />MEETING OF JULY 2, 1981, AS WRITTEN. <br />THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS <br />TO THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF JULY 13, 1981. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER'_WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SCURLOCK, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL <br />MEETING OF JULY 13, 19811 AS WRITTEN. <br />THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS <br />TO THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF JULY 14, 1981. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL <br />MEETING OF JULY 14, 1981, AS WRITTEN. <br />THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF THERE WERE ANY ADDITIONS OR CORRECTIONS <br />TO THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 15, 1981. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER REFERRED TO PAGE 58 WHERE MENTION <br />WAS MADE TO THE YEAR 1980. AFTER SOME DISCUSSION, IT WAS POINTED <br />OUT THAT HE COULD NOT HAVE VOTED IN OPPOSITION AT THIS MEETING,:SINCE <br />HE WAS NOT A COMMISSIONER AT THAT TIME. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK REFERRED TO PAGE 45 AND DISCUSSED <br />PARAGRAPH 4 REGARDING THE INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD PROJECT, AND <br />QUESTIONED WHETHER OR NOT THE BOARD HAD VOTED FORMAL APPROVAL OF THE <br />PROJECT. <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE AFFIRMED THERE HAD BEEN DISCUSSIONS <br />AND THE CONSENSUS WAS THAT INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD WAS TO BE -CONTINUED <br />AS PLANNED, AND BUILT. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK COMMENTED THAT HE AGREED WITH THE <br />CONSENSUS; THE BOARD HAD ENTERED INTO A DISCUSSION AND HE EXPRESSED <br />RESERVATIONS ABOUT THE PROJECT, BUT WOULD SUPPORT IT - HE WANTED TO <br />LOOK AT THE COST FIGURES. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.