My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/5/1981 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
8/5/1981 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:18 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:36:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/05/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUG 51981 <br />The following amounts should be budgeted for the coming fiscal year: <br />141 - 5800 lumen lights at $7.55/mo. $1,064.55/mo. _ $12,744.60/yr. <br />43 - 9600 lumen lights at $8.96/mo. - 385.28/mo. = 4,623.36/yr. <br />9 - wood poles at $1.65/mo. = 14.85/mo. = 178.20/yr. <br />TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $1,464.68/mo. $17,576.16/yr. <br />if this plan is accepted, we will enter into a formal street lighting agreement. <br />If you require further information, please contact this Department. <br />Very truly yours, <br />Frank H. Call <br />Manager, Electrical Engineering <br />ATTORNEY JENNINGS DESCRIBED THE APPROXIMATE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPOSED <br />DISTRICT AND REPORTED THAT THE PROPERTY APPRAISER WOULD SUPPLY <br />INFORMATION ABOUT THE APPROXIMATE COST. IN REGARD TO THOSE WHO' <br />MIGHT NOT HAVE TO PAY ANYTHING BECAUSE OF HOMESTEAD EXEMPTIONS, HE <br />NOTED THAT PROPERTY APPRAISER NOLTE HAD STATED THAT IT IS POSSIBLE <br />TO HAVE A PER PARCEL PAYMENT WHICH WOULD MEAN THAT EVERYONE WOULD <br />PAY FOR THE LIGHTS, REGARDLESS OF ANY EXEMPTION. MR. JENNINGS .FELT <br />THIS WOULD BE THE FAIREST WAY INSTEAD OF HAVING A SMALL GROUP OF <br />PEOPLE PAYING ALL THE TAXES TO HAVE THE LIGHTS. <br />A LADY IN THE AUDIENCE INQUIRED IF THE LANDOWNER WOULD HAVE <br />TO PAY IF THEY WERE LIVING IN NEW YORK, FOR INSTANCE, AND IT WAS <br />EXPLAINED THAT ALL LAND OWNERS WHEREVER LOCATED WOULD BE ASSESSED <br />BY THE PARCEL. <br />HEARD. <br />THE CHAIRMAN ASKED IF ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WISHED TO BE <br />MR. RICHARDSON OF GIFFORD ASKED WHY THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT <br />CUTTING OUT HOMESTEAD EXEMPTIONS AND THEN HAVING PAY MORE TAXES WHEN <br />THEY ARE ALREADY PAYING TAXES. <br />ATTORNEY .JENNINGS EXPLAINED THAT GIFFORD IS AN UNINCORPORATED <br />AREA, AND THE COUNTY HAS NO RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE ANY MUNICIPAL <br />SERVICES; S0, IF THE GIFFORD COMMUNITY WANTS LIGHTS, THEY HAVE TO PAY <br />FOR THEM, AND IT IS FAIREST TO TAX EVERYONE THE SMALL AMOUNT IT WILL <br />COST TO PAY FOR THESE LIGHTS. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.