My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/18/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
8/18/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:18 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:37:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/18/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AUG 181991 <br />Boac 4 . PAGE 201. <br />ARMIN SIEFARTH DECLINED HIS OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK, <br />ANN ROBINSON OF NASSAU DRIVE INFORMED THE BOARD THAT AT THE <br />PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION, SHE PROPOSED <br />AN OPEN SPACE CATEGORY BE ADDED SIMILAR TO THAT OF THE CITY OF VERO <br />BEACH, AND THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION APPROVED HER SUGGESTION; <br />SHE HOPED THE BOARD WOULD ALSO. MRS. ROBINSON SUGGESTED THAT THE MD -1 <br />AREA NORTH OF BARBER AVENUE AND EAST OF U.S. 1 BE MADE LD -1 BECAUSE <br />MUCH OF THIS IS WETLANDS AND ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE, AND IT IS NOT <br />IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST TO ENCOURAGE DEVELOPMENT IN THE AA FLOOD ZONE. <br />MRS, ROBINSON STATED THAT IF 127,000 IS THE GENERAL CONSENSUS OF THE <br />POPULATION WE WOULD HAVE IN THE YEAR 20001 SHE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE <br />COMMISSION ESTABLISH A WAY TO SEE THAT IS THE MAXIMUM POPULATION <br />RAYMOND SCENT SPOKE IN FAVOR OF THE PLAN PROPOSED BY THE <br />PLANNING STAFF, HE NOTED THAT THE FIFTH AMENDMENT SAYS PRIVATE PROPERTY <br />CANNOT BE TAKEN WITHOUT JUST COMPENSATION AND WENT ON TO DISCUSS ZONING <br />WHICH CONFISCATES PROPERTY RIGHTS, INVERSE CONDEMNATION, ETC, HE THEN <br />RECITED A TALE ABOUT PEOPLE WHO LIVE ON A HILLSIDE BUT DON T WANT <br />ANYONE ELSE TO MOVE THERE AND SPOIL THEIR VIEW. MR SCENT STATED THAT <br />.OUR BUSINESS PEOPLE NEED HOMES; THEY ARE HERE; AND THEY ARE ENTITLED <br />TO A WAY OF LIFE ALSO, HE FELT THE PRESENT PLAN, WHICH IS A DOWN- <br />GRADING OF THE OLD ONE BY A GOOD 40%, IS A GOOD ONE AND THAT TO GO <br />ANY FURTHER WOULD JUST BE A PROBLEM. <br />HANK PARMAN OF THE BOARD OF REALTORS STATED THAT THEY SUPPORT <br />ADOPTION OF THE PLAN WHICH WAS DONE BY EXPERIENCED PROFESSIONALS, HE <br />POINTED OUT THAT WE WILL NOT AND CANNOT BECOME ANOTHER FORT LAUDERDALE; <br />OUR DENSITIES AND OUR HEIGHT LIMITATIONS HAVE BEEN LOWER SINCE 1971, <br />MR, PARMAN FELT THE MASTER PLAN MUST BE IMPLEMENTED OR OUR TAX BASE <br />WILL BE GREATLY AFFECTED, AND HE URGED THE BOARD TO ADOPT THE PROPOSED <br />PLAN. <br />WILLIAM ZEEDYK, PRESIDENT OF TREASURE COAST CONDOMINIUM <br />ASSOCIATION, READ THE FOLLOWING LETTER OBJECTING TO DENSITY IN THE <br />PROPOSED PLAN: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.