Laserfiche WebLink
THE NEXT STEP IS TO LOOK AT THE SURROUNDING AREA TO SEE <br />WHAT HAS BEEN PROPOSED, AND IN THIS CASE, TO THE NORTH WE HAVE AN LD -2 <br />ZONE NOT TO EXCEED 6 UNITS PER ACRE AND TO THE WEST LD -1 NOT TO EXCEED <br />3 UNITS PER ACRE, NEXT TO THAT BORDER, WE HAVE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT <br />AT 4 AND 5 UNITS PER ACRE. TSR. REVER THEN EXPLAINED HOW THEY LAID <br />OUT THE PROPOSED ZONING, DESIGNATING THE OUTERMOST AREAS AT 4 UNITS <br />PER ACRE AND MOVING INWARD WITH 6 UNITS PER ACRE WITH THE INTENT OF <br />INTERNALLY BUFFERING THE LOWEST ZONING; THEN ON TO AREAS WITH S AND <br />12 UNITS PER ACRE AS YOU MOVE TOWARDS THE CENTRAL CORE OF THE AREA. <br />IN THE MIDDLE AROUND WHAT IS AN EXISTING SCHOOL AND AN APPROVED PROPOSAL <br />FOR 12 UNITS PER ACRE,,IS THE HIGHEST DENSITY, WHICH CAN BE 16 UNITS <br />PER ACRE, AND FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS PROTOTYPE IS SET AT 16 UNITS PER <br />ACRE, WHEN ADDING TOGETHER THE AMOUNT OF ACRES AND THE LAND USE <br />DENSITIES JUST SPOKEN OF, YOU ARRIVE AT A DENSITY OF S UNITS PER ACRE <br />FOR THE NEW AREA.: WHEN THE TOTAL ACREAGE OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT <br />IS ADDED TO WHAT IS PROPOSED, THEY CAME UP WITH A TOTAL DENSITY OF <br />6.36 FOR THE ENTIRE AREA. HOWEVER, IN DETERMINING THESE FIGURES, <br />MR, REVER POINTED OUT THAT THE VACANT SPACE (PARKS, CEMETERIES, SCHOOLS, <br />COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL UNITS, AREAS WHICH DO NOT GENERATE MORE HOUSING) <br />WAS NOT ADDED IN, WHEN THE ACREAGE OF THE OPEN SPACE WAS ADDED IN, <br />THEY CAME UP WITH AN OVERALL DENSITY AT TOTAL BUILD -OUT IN THE GIFFORD <br />MXD AREA OF 4.1 UNITS PER ACRE - NOT 161 BUT 4.1, <br />MR, REVER EXPRESSED THE HOPE THAT, WITH THE PRECEDING EXPLANA- <br />TION IN MIND, THE PUBLIC WOULD LOOK AT,THE PLAN IN THE SAME PERSPECTIVE <br />AS THE PLANNERS ARE LOOKING AT THE PLAN AND REALIZE THAT IT IS INTENDED <br />TO ALLOW THE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE FLEXIBILITY NEEDED TO PROVIDE HOUSING <br />FOR EVERYONE IN AREAS WHERE ECONOMICS WILL ALLOW, HE NOTED THAT WE <br />ALL REALIZE THE BEACH -IS LOVELY AND THE PLAN PROVIDES FOR THE LOWER <br />DENSITIES TO BE THERE, WE CANNOT ALL AFFORD TO LIVE THERE, HOWEVER, <br />AND WE MUST TAKE CARE OF ALL THE PEOPLE..' MR. REVER BELIEVED THAT THE <br />PROPOSED PLAN DOES THAT. <br />MR. REVER INTRODUCED SENIOR PLANNER CHALLACOMBE TO REVIEW <br />THE ANALYSIS AND THE IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES WHICH THEY USED TO CREATE <br />THE PLAN. <br />AUG 18 1981 7 Box 47 PAGE 190 <br />