Laserfiche WebLink
AUG 191991 Aft 47 1pAu233 <br />QUESTION AROSE AS TO PARTICIPATION BY THE CONSTITUTIONAL <br />OFFICERS, AND IT WAS EXPLAINED THAT THE COUNTY HAS TO ADOPT THE <br />ORDINANCE, AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS WOULD CONTRACT UNDER IT <br />SEPARATELY. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SCURLOCK, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING, <br />CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION ENSUED, AND THE BOARD GENERALLY HAD <br />NO PROBLEM WITH SETTING UP A VEHICLE TO ALLOW A DEFERRED COMPENSATION <br />PLAN, BUT WERE RELUCTANT TO BE PLACED IN THE POSITION OF ENDORSING <br />A PARTICULAR PLAN. IT WAS FELT FURTHER INFORMATION AND ANALYSIS WERE <br />NEEDED. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />FLETCHER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AGREED TO TABLE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION <br />ON A DEFERRED COMPENSATION PROGRAM FOR COUNTY EMPLOYEES UNTIL SUCH <br />TIME AS WE CAN RESTUDY AND RE-EVALUATE, <br />CLERK TO TFHE BOARD <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER WODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SCURLOCK, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE FOLLOWING BUDGET AMENDMENT <br />FOR UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION AS RECOMMENDED BY FINANCE DIRECTOR <br />BARTON$ <br />ml <br />