Laserfiche WebLink
sI <br />ATTORNEY HOULIHAN AGREED THAT OWNERSHIP OR CONTROL WOULD <br />INCLUDE TRUSTEES. <br />CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION ENSUED AS TO TAKING TITLE TO PROPERTY <br />AS A TRUSTEE. IT WAS NOTED THAT AT THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION <br />MEETING UNDER DISCUSSION, THREE OR FOUR CORPORATIONS APPLIED FOR SITE <br />PLAN APPROVAL AND NO LIST OF STOCKHOLDERS WAS REQUIRED. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER VIODTKE, SECONDED BY COMMIS- <br />SIONER BIRD, BASED UPON INFORMATION SUBMITTED AND ADVICE OF THE COUNTY <br />ATTORNEY THAT THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION <br />WAS CORRECT, TO DENY THE APPEAL CONTESTING APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN <br />OF THE SURF AND RACQUET CLUB. <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER HAD FURTHER QUESTIONS ABOUT WHO HAS <br />THE RIGHT TO APPEAL, THE TIME PERIOD, ETC., AND IT WAS FELT POLICY <br />QUESTIONS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED AT ANOTHER TIME. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON AND <br />CARRIED 4 TO 1 WITH COMMISSIONER FLETCHER VOTING IN OPPOSITION. <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS COMMENTED THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE <br />PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ADOPT A POLICY IN WHICH PASSAGE REQUIRES <br />AT LEAST THREE VOTES, AND IF ONLY THREE PEOPLE ARE PRESENT, IT MUST <br />BE UNANIMOUS. HE FELT POSSIBLY THE COUNTY COMMISSION SHOULD ADOPT <br />THIS SAME POLICY. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS WAS NOT SURE THE BOARD COULD ESTABLISH PROCE-.; <br />DURE INCONSISTENT WITH STATUTORY PROCEDURE FOR THE COUNTY COMMISSION, <br />BUT FELT THEY MIGHT BE ABLE TO DO SO FOR THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMIS- <br />SION. <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL - KINGSLAKE SUBDIVISION UNIT II <br />ADMINISTRATOR NELSON REVIEWED THE FOLLOWING MEMO: <br />m <br />Book 47 <br />