9/1/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page Three Mr. Patrick B. Lyons August 17, 1981 In fact, in its present form, the proposed Plan would not permit our residents in five condominiums to rebuild in the event of a catastrophe. Because The Moorings is a community which is already 88% to 90% complete, we believe that it is grossly unfair to apply this new Land Use Plan in a restrictive manner to our remaining property. Not only does the proposed Plan arbitrarily and unfairly damage the interests of The Moorings, but it also discriminates against a company which for more than 12 years has done everything in its power to enhance the quality of life in Indian River County. THE MOORINGS' REQUEST In order to be equitable to The Moorings Development Company, therefore, we request that you give favorable consideration to one of the two following alternatives: Alternative Number 1 a. Adapt the Comprehensive Land Use Plan to preserve the re- stricted commercial property for the uses we had intended by indicating a "community commercial" node designation for lots 56 and 57, and b. Adapt the Comprehensive Land Use Plan to preserve the remain- ing multi -family for the use we had intended (which density we were specifically granted by the Indian River County Board of Commissioners as recently as February ) by indicating MD -2 for lots 55 and 119. Alternative Number 2 Specify in the language of the Plan that the entire original land area of The Moorings is a single entity to which the LD -1 zoning is applied, allow density averaging, thus permitting us to develop lots 55 and 119 as multi -family and indicating a "community commercial" node designation for lots 56 and 57. CONCLUSION It should be emphasized that none of the many discussions we have had with members of the Planning and Zoning Department -and with members of the County Commission suggest that there is any intent to penalize SEP 1 1981 BOOK 47 PArx