My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/1/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
9/1/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:18 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:39:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/01/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r BOOK 47 PAGE J, <br />SEP 1 1981 <br />LAND IN ORDER TO ALLOW THEM TO MAINTAIN A DECENT WATER TABLE AND <br />HAVE SOME GREEN AREA. <br />WILLIAM STEWART, ATTORNEY, CAME BEFORE THE BOARD REPRESENTING <br />THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT. HE STATED THAT THE PLAN <br />DESCRIBED A 13O ACRE HOSPITAL COMMERCIAL NODE OFF 37TH STREET AND <br />BARBER AVENUE, AND DID NOT FEEL IT IS CLEAR WHETHER THE HOSPITAL <br />PROPERTY IS INCLUDED OR WHETHER IT IS ELIGIBLE FOR INCLUSION IN <br />THAT COMMERCIAL NODE. HE ASKED THAT THE LANGUAGE BE CLARIFIED <br />IN THIS RESPECT. SIR. STEWART NOTED THAT IT APPEARS THERE WILL <br />BE A LOT OF CHANGES IN THE PLAN AS A RESULT OF THESE PUBLIC HEARINGS, <br />AND HE WOULD ASK THAT AMPLE TIME BE ALLOWED FOR PEOPLE TO REVIEW <br />THE FINAL DOCUMENT AND THAT SOME TIME BE ALLOWED FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. <br />PSR. STEWART WENT ON TO MAKE A PERSONAL COMMENT, NOTING THAT <br />PEOPLE TEND TO TAKE EXTREME VIEWS AT PUBLIC HEARINGS, BUT HE <br />BELIEVED THAT IF YOU AVERAGE IT OUT, THERE ACTUALLY IS NOT A RADICAL <br />DIFFERENCE IN AIMS. HE DID NOT BELIEVE THE MECHANISM THAT WILL <br />MEASURE GROWTH HAS BEEN ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED, HOWEVER, AND HE DID <br />NOT FEEL THE ONE YEAR REVIEW IS ENOUGH, BUT FELT THERE SHOULD BE A <br />CONTINUING PROCESS STRUCTURED BY THE COUNTY COMMISSION TO CONSTANTLY <br />AND CONTINUALLY EVALUATE THE GROWTH AND SEE IF THE PROJECTIONS <br />ARE INDEED ACCURATE. HE BELIEVED THAT SUCH STRUCTURE AND MECHANISM <br />TO EVALUATE ACTUAL GROWTH IS REALLY ALMOST MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE <br />PLAN ITSELF AND FELT IT SHOULD BE GIVEN A LOT OF CONSIDERATION. <br />ED SMITH WAS CALLED AND DID NOT ANSWER. <br />LLOYD CLARK WAS CALLED AND DID NOT ANSWER. <br />TOM ALDRICH INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE CAME TO SIT AND LISTEN <br />WITH NO INTENTION OF ADDRESSING THE MEETING UNTIL THIS GENTLEMAN <br />GOT UP AND AT THE END OF HIS SPEECH SAID HE DID NOT THINK THE <br />GENERAL PUBLIC WAS INTELLIGENT ENOUGH TO MAKE A DECISION ON THEIR <br />OWN THROUGH A REFERENDUM. HE CAME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE <br />GENTLEMAN 11 DID NOT HAVE BOTH OARS IN THE WATER", BUT THEN ANOTHER <br />GENTLEMAN SAID THE SAME THING. MR. ALDRICH FELT THE BOARD SHOULD <br />AGREE THAT THE GENERAL PUBLIC SHOWED A GREAT BIT OF COMMONSENSE <br />AND KNOWLEDGE WHEN THEY ELECTED THE COMMISSIONERS, AND NOW THAT <br />SAME PUBLIC IS ASKING THE BOARD TO LET THEM PROVE THAT THEY DO HAVE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.