Laserfiche WebLink
COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK QUESTIONED NOT HAVING MORE THAN ONE <br />ARCHITECT FROM WHICH TO CHOOSE. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR DAVID GREENE EXPLAINED THAT THEY <br />WANTED TO PROCEED QUICKLY WITH THE PROJECT AND HAVE FLEXIBILITY IN <br />WORKING WITH THE ARCHITECT. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS ADDED THAT AS LONG AS THE CONTRACT FOR <br />THE ARCHITECT'S SERVICES WERE UNDER $5,000, ADVERTISEMENT WAS NOT <br />REQUIRED. HE THEN EXPLAINED THE PROFESSIONAL NEGOTIATION ACT. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK SUGGESTED SENDING A LETTER TO THE <br />LOCAL ARCHITECTS INFORMING THEM THAT THE JOB WAS AVAILABLE, GIVING <br />THEM A CHANCE TO BID ON IT. <br />ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR GREENE INTERJECTED THAT THE ARCHITECT <br />WOULD BE ON A ° CALL " BASIS TO WORK WITH THE COUNTY STAFF, <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER.SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />BIRD, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE STAFF TO CONTACT LOCAL <br />ARCHITECTS AND MAKE A SELECTION,*IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $5,000, <br />FUNDED FROM ACCOUNT N0. 001-906-523-6639, TO ASSIST IN PREPARING <br />PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE COUNTY .JAIL RENOVATION. <br />CHAIRMAN- LYONS LED THE DISCUSSION REGARDING FUTURE <br />MEETINGS OF THE LAND USE PLAN. IN ORDER TO GET THE MAXIMUM INPUT <br />FROM THE INTERESTED CITIZENS, IT WAS FELT ADDITIONAL COMMENTS SHOULD <br />BE ACCEPTED FROM THOSE WHO HAVE NOT HAD A CHANCE TO SPEAK. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK, SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER, THAT THE BOARD WILL ENTERTAIN ADDITIONAL <br />COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC AT THE FUTURE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN <br />HEARINGS. <br />--'` CHAIRMAN LYONS SUGGESTED THAT AFTER ALL THE PUBLIC INPUT <br />IS HEARD, THE COUNTY COULD BE DIVIDED INTO THIRDS AND A SPECIAL <br />MEETING COULD BE SET UP TO CONSIDER THE SPECIFICS IN THAT PARTICULAR <br />AREA OF THE COUNTY. <br />MORE DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ALONG THOSE LINES. <br />SECS 2 1991 som. 47 pAcE 350 <br />13 <br />