Laserfiche WebLink
The designers rl:yve failed to i.iclu :e �,u-A is fent :.itigat; pro- <br />ceduros in the desi,,n rpian:­. Cr: .'c,)ril 27, 1931, the 1''';ritia Carle <br />and Fresh dater .- ish Corimis�dan stx ,�sted .lour modifications - <br />three of these relatively in .:ost or design Chang o. These <br />were: <br />1) Removal of the old c:onLrol dike and fille:i area south <br />of `forth Canal and west of t:i:e road ali.gninent to restore iutertieal <br />habitat - a dosign feature L hat i,; already a par: oa the project. <br />?) Rcrioval of the dike north o- Horth Canal, thus providing <br />3%4 a. -re of additional intortidal habitat. <br />3). .'eplact.nent of the flap gates with flashboard ri ;er.s to <br />maximise -Eu Lura manag{_meilt_ c: )tioilf; _U% i7?Tpoundment, <ir?iIl Uf't and <br />tidal access. <br />gib) Re lit~iT1t•'n Of I�?Lii; C�(� Cl.li�'?`Ci_r w'.th Allt1S�'ikl(� �(A risers. <br />Three or the four requests hdve not. been incoT poi".teij into the <br />road desi-t., and acco-_-dln£: Ln t.li:� C,jiLnt`, Acl_111nistr: "Or 1.I1 a maim <br />:n t `'t <br />On AL"hist .::i), l fv� , ri:ili 1'li L i, e? i,I T !fit : Q low r£';5��*jti; <br />t_ana1/ <br />t3S n0J_ '(}ccn- .. f i`Iriy)! 1_':1k' a. ;I:G' n"3r5 t'.3`r'E:= t .iii:;?- 1 <br />tit.:: i. anti <br />._t would be me red a xpellsiv f' C:'h ]il �.: � i �lllil feel. c1i'YirUr <br />" :eco,lraendation No. 3 1re,,ents question. It appears <br />;:hat the owne i-3 clid nor 'Atilt t- i'dal 47at;e� In the -'-e and if we did <br />tris the owners would ha ­e ti-rinl -• :t.?- in, there. Reynold:=, --midi <br />::nd grill, a:3 Cve11 as our Ut:tcriley, that there is a legal (lues - <br />tion. Quen Wilson has as'•.e j the i_iu :or a legal ruling regarding <br />this particular issue." <br />ifRecQ=eadat.ion No. 4. The culverts are plugged, here again, <br />to appease the land holders aad we would have objections from them <br />if xia would put in the flaslit)card risers rather than the plugs.,' <br />It is quite apparent to me that up until now the owners of these <br />environxe:ntally sensitive wetlands have not only had a lot of input <br />inter this public project, but they have been blessed withk supply <br />if advocates in thein behalf amon17 our county administration„ant: <br />the project pladhne'rs . <br />How else could they have leen 5c SUCCAssful illi obtaining; free <br />pos11' ive? :'rainag;e of their oL'Lznc:s at public exponse? 1, fe%lt°mbnr, <br />Oieso lands ars' not devel-Qpet: with bullrings already in place. <br />Chis is vacant undeveloped wotlanL's developed by nature to natur- <br />Aly handle tiJal_ flow and unlan:_: drainage. By what stretch of <br />_:ase law or court precedes z an ti,. y require that the public provide <br />tlherl with free drainage? <br />To n )pons 1-- h- 1,nzwlower,� v. -5t <br />igners have .3.11.3ed :sill arlr_: <br />