Laserfiche WebLink
The only location the County has jurisdiction over sewer allocation <br />is the 600,000 gallons per day for the South County (Vero Mall, 6th -Ave) <br />area. We currently have agreements (i.e. paid impact fees for water and <br />sewer service for) 280,300 gallons per day. There have been serious <br />discussions with other developers to account for an added service demand <br />for 83,800 gallons per day. The largest development in this group <br />(Southgate Mobile Home Park for 27,300 gallons per day) is known to have <br />to come into the county system because their DER permit for their treatment <br />plant will not be renewed. If only these come on to the county system <br />we will have a reserve of only 235.900 gallons per day. <br />The 6th Avenue area is developing with a majority of condominium/ <br />apartment projects which preclude the use of septic tanks in the "Rock - <br />ridge" area., <br />We are a year away from having our own water plant with its increase <br />of availability of water service. Two developments smaller than the <br />Tropic Villas project can use up the remaining 235,900 gallons per day. <br />Another area in the County, whose allocation we do not control, is <br />the 400,000 gallons per day for the hospital. All discussions about the <br />size of this allocation imply that it is for expansion to schools, resi- <br />dence quarters, and doctor suites - the type of which are being constructed <br />at the Ralmar development. It would appear that this would be a alternate <br />to explore for any allocation transfer. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />We recommend that the 25,000 to 30,000 gallons per day requested <br />for allocation from the County be denied since availability of this <br />trade-off from South County is not sufficient for all needs. <br />IN DISCUSSION, IT WAS NOTED THAT THE CITY OF VERO BEACH <br />STILL FEELS WE WOULD HAVE TO GIVE UP SOME OF OUR ALLOCATION TO <br />COMPLY WITH THIS REQUEST. COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK POINTED OUT THAT <br />AN OVERALL PLAN FOR SERVICE FOR THIS AREA IS NOT AVAILABLE, AND UN— <br />TILL WE ADDRESS THE OVERALL HOSPITAL AREA, HE FELT WE WOULD BE REMISS <br />IN DOLING OUT SMALL ALLOCATIONS. <br />ATTORNEY ROBERTJACKSON CAME BEFORE THE BOARD REPRESENTING <br />RALMAR ASSOCIATES, HE WENT INTO THE HISTORY OF THE SITUATION IN <br />DETAIL, NOTING THAT THE CITY WOULD NOT ALLOW THEM TO TAP IN ON THE <br />HOSPITAL LINE SO THEY WENT AHEAD AND GOT A D.E.R. PERMIT FOR A WELL <br />AND TREATMENT PLANT, HE FURTHER NOTED THAT THEY PUT IN A 4" LINE ALL <br />THE WAY TO THE LIFT STATION SOUTH OF THE HOSPITAL AT RALMAR'S EXPENSE <br />AND PAID THE CITY $9,100 FOR THEIR FUTURE EXPANSION. RALMAR°S ORIGINAL <br />PLAN WAS FOR A WHOLE 10 ACRE COMPLEX OF MEDICALLY RELATED FACILITIES, <br />AND ONLY HALF OF THAT HAS GONE IN AT THIS TIME; THE BLOOD BANK HAS <br />MOVED._IN THERE AND THE NURSING HOME. IF THE CITY STAYS WITH THEIR <br />DECISION TO DENY MORE PERMITS, ATTORNEY JACKSON STATED THAT THEY WILL <br />HAVE NO ALTERNATIVE EXCEPT TO GO BACK TO BUILDING THEIR OWN PACKAGE <br />TREATMENT PLANT. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO DEVELOPMENT ON 6TH AVENUE, THE <br />HOSPITAL ALLOCATION, AND THE ALTERNATIVE OF EXTENDING A LINE TO THE <br />GIFFORD PLANT AND POSSIBLY CROSSING U.S.1 VIA THE BRIDGE AT LINDSEY <br />ROAD. <br />SEP 16 1991 <br />25 47 FAu 492 <br />L <br />