Laserfiche WebLink
r 5 E P 1.6 1991 Bo ox 47 PAcE 495 <br />3L B <br />van CUVE- <br />SUBDIV. <br />�1 <br />,l <br />SALTAI R COVE <br />15/0 81 -8 <br />I <br />ATTORNEY GENE RODDENBERRY MADE A PRESENTATION ON BEHALF <br />OF THE APPLICANTS, EXPLAINING THAT THEY WISH TO DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY <br />INTO SEVEN LOTS, AND SINCE A 50' ROAD WOULD EFFECTIVELY LIMIT SUCH <br />DEVELOPMENT THEY ARE REQUESTING THE VARIANCE AS DESCRIBED IN STAFF S <br />MEMO. <br />SOME DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO THE NEED FOR A TURN—AROUND <br />FOR CARS, AND ATTORNEY RODDENBERRY STATED THAT A CUL DE SAC IS <br />ACCEPTABLE TO THEM. <br />ATTORNEY ,JEROME QUINN NEXT TOOK THE FLOOR REPRESENTING <br />NIRS. HOPWOOD, THE ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER TO THE NORTH, AND SPEAKING <br />IN OPPOSITION TO THE APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE. HE OBJECTED BOTH TO <br />THE FORM AND THE SUBSTANCE OF THE APPLICATION, CLAIMING THAT THE APPLI— <br />CATION MERELY DESCRIBES THE LENGTH AND WIDTH OF THE PROPERTY AND THE <br />APPLICANT S DESIRE TO SUBDIVIDE INTO SEVEN LOTS, WHICH DOES NOT FULFILL <br />THE REQUIREMENT TO DEMONSTRATE SPECIAL CONDITIONS AND CIRCUMSTANCES <br />PECULIAR TO THIS LAND WHICH ARE NOT APPLICABLE TO OTHER LANDS, HE <br />FURTHER NOTED THAT THE ORDINANCE REQUIRES THAT THE SPECIAL CONDITIONS <br />DO NOT RESULT FROM ACTIONS OF THE APPLICANT. HE POINTED OUT THAT WHEN <br />THE APPLICANT PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY, THEY HAD EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO <br />REVIEW THE SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS, AND THIS IS, THEP.EFORE, AN <br />ACQUIRED 11 HARDSHIP OF WHICH THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN AWARE. MR. QUINN <br />FELT IT WOULD BE VERY HARD FOR THE BOARD TO MAKE FINDINGS OF FACT <br />28 <br />