Laserfiche WebLink
r SEP 16 1991 BOOK 4 7 PAGE535 <br />CONSIDERABLE DISCUSSION ENSUED AS TO THE POSSIBLE ANNEXA- <br />TION AND THE AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY, AND IT WAS FELT ANY NEW AGREE- <br />MENT SHOULD CONFIRM THE PRIOR AGREEMENT AND SET FORTH THE RESPONSIBILITY <br />FOR DEFINITE AREAS. <br />UTILITY DIRECTOR LINER NOTED THAT THE COUNTY IS ESTIMATING <br />THEIR ASSESSMENT AT ABOUT $800 PER UNIT WHILE THE TOWN OF INDIAN <br />RIVER SHORES IS ANTICIPATING AN ASSESSMENT OF $635 PER UNIT; S0, IT IS <br />TO THE INTEREST OF THE RESIDENTS INVOLVED TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE TOWN. <br />DISCUSSION FOLLOWED AS TO THE FACT THAT IT IS WORTH SOMETHING TO THE <br />COUNTY TO BE ABLE TO GET THE SEWAGE PLANT OUT OF THE PARK AREA, AND WE <br />SHOULD TAKE THIS INTO CONSIDERATION IN ARRIVING AT AN ASSESSMENT CHARGE. <br />IT WAS NOTED THAT INDIAN RIVER SHORES HAS A BIGGER BASE TO WORK ON THAN <br />THE COUNTY DOES, AND FURTHER NOTED THAT TIMING IS CRITICAL. UTILITY <br />DIRECTOR LINER STATED THAT THE PEBBLE BAY PLANT CAN ACCEPT MORE SERVICE,_ <br />BUT THE LIFT STATION IS WHAT IS CRITICAL. <br />CONVERSATION CONTINUED, AND ATTORNEY COLLINS SUGGESTED THAT <br />THE COMMISSION HOLD A JOINT MEETING WITH THE INDIAN RIVER SHORES TOWN <br />COUNCIL. IT WAS GENERALLY FELT THAT WAS A GOOD IDEA. <br />WILLIAM KOOLAGE, CITIZEN, OBJECTED TO THE COMMISSION TRYING <br />TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE TOWN OF INDIAN RIVER SHORES ANY FURTHER. <br />THE BOARD FELT THAT GETTING RID OF THE SEWAGE PLANT WAS <br />WORTH A FURTHER EFFORT, AND IT WAS AGREED THAT IF CHAIRMAN LYONS' <br />MEETING WITH INDIAN RIVER SHORES COUNCILMAN FRITZ GIERHART INDICATED <br />THAT SUCH A MEETING MIGHT BE FRUITFUL, A JOINT MEETING SHOULD BE <br />SCHEDULED, AND THE AWARD OF BID WOULD BE HANDLED AFTER THAT TIME. <br />EMERGENCY ITEM RE HIRING SPECIALIZED LAW FIRM TO HANDLE APPEAL OF <br />DISTRICT COURT'S DECISION RE THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ARBITRATION <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BIRD, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />WODTKE, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADDED TO TODAY'S AGENDA AN EMERGENCY <br />ITEM IN REGARD TO HIRING A SPECIALIZED LAW FIRM TO HANDLE AN APPEAL <br />AS ABOVE, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS EXPLAINED THAT REINHOLD CONSTRUCTION HAS <br />FILED AN INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL TO THE DISTRICT COURT'S DECISION TO LET <br />ALL THREE PARTIES (THE ARCHITECT, THE CONTRACTOR, AND THE COUNTY) JOIN <br />IN THE ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS. HE STATED THAT SUCH AN APPEAL IS VERY <br />SPECIALIZED AND THE COUNTY WOULD BE BETTER OFF HIRING SOMEONE WHO <br />DEALS MAINLY IN THIS TYPE OF WORK. HE SUGGESTED THAT MARJORIE GADARIAN <br />16 8 <br />