My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/21/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
9/21/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:19 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:44:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/21/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 47 FACE 578 <br />SEP 211981 <br />DEVELOPMENT AND AGREED WITH THIS IN THEORY, BUT FELT WE MAY <br />HAVE TO DO THIS THROUGH ZONING RATHER THAN LAND USE DESIGNATION. <br />VICE CHAIRMAN WODTKE NOTED THAT IT IS LATE AND WE STILL <br />HAVE TWO BASIC AREAS LEFT TO TAKE UP THIS EVENING - THE COMMERCIAL <br />AREA ON U.S. 1 AND THE NORTH SIDE OF ROUTE 60, AND AN MXD CORRIDOR: <br />ON S.R. 510. <br />ATTORNEY COOKSEY REQUESTED THAT IF THESE ITEMS ARE HELD <br />OVER THAT A TIME CERTAIN BE SET FOR THEM TO BE TAKEN UP. IT WAS <br />DECIDED THAT THE MD -1 AREA JUST DISCUSSED WOULD BE THE FIRST ITEM <br />ON THE AGENDA OF THE OCTOBER 5TH MEETING, AND THE OTHER ITEMS WOULD <br />BE DISCUSSED AT THE OCTOBER 1ST MEETING AT THE COMMUNITY CENTER IN <br />SEBASTIAN WHEN NORTH COUNTY PROPERTIES WERE DISCUSSED. <br />REALTOR ED SCHLITT STATED THAT HE HAD A VERY SIMPLE ITEM <br />ON TONIGHT `S AGENDA AND ASKED THAT IT BE ADDRESSED NOW, IT RELATES <br />TO A SMALL COMMERCIAL AREA WEST OF VERO BEACH ON THE NORTH SIDE OF <br />ROUTE 60 NEAR THE I','ESTSIDE BANK. HIS WEST BRANCH OFFICE IS LOCATED <br />THERE AND A VACANT LOT WHERE THEY ARE PUTTING IN A SMALL OFFICE <br />BUILDING. THAT IS ALL THE COMMERCIAL LAND THERE IS, AND THE PLANNING <br />STAFF EARLIER INDICATED THAT WAS WHAT THE COMMERCIAL NODE WAS FOR, <br />MR. SCHLITT DID NOT WANT TO BE LEFT IN A NON -CONFORMING CATEGORY AND NOT <br />BE ABLE TO DO ANY EXPANSION. HIS REQUEST WAS SIMPLY THAT THE COMMERCIAL <br />PROPERTY THAT IS ALREADY COMMERCIALLY DEVELOPED AND HAS A BUILDING <br />PERMIT REMAIN COMMERCIAL. HE FELT IT WOULD BE BETTER JUST TO LEAVE <br />THIS COMMERCIAL THAN PUT A NODE THERE WHICH WOULD EXPAND THE AREA. <br />IT WAS NOTED THAT THE BOARD EARLIER IN THE EVENING HAD <br />DISCUSSED GRANDFATHERING EXISTING COMMERCIAL, AND MR, SCHLITT STATED <br />HE WOULD BE SATISFIED WITH THAT, <br />NORMAN BADENHOP WISHED TO KNOW IF THE PUBLIC WILL GET <br />ANOTHER CRACK AT THE BARRIER ISLAND ON OCTOBER 5TH, AND VICE CHAIRMAN <br />WODTKE FELT THIS WOULD HAVE TO BE TAKEN UP WITH THE CHAIRMAN. <br />WILLIAM CULP, WHO LIVES OFF OF RANCH ROAD, EXPRESSED CONCERN <br />THAT THERE IS EXISTING ZONING FOR R -].E AND R -M IN THIS AREA AND THERE <br />ALSO ARE MOBILE HOMES AND MD -1. HE WISHED TO KNOW IF HE SHOULD BE <br />CONCERNED ABOUT THIS. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.