My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/30/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
9/30/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:19 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:45:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/30/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SCP 501981 <br />BOOK P� F► vi <br />c.� <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER RESPONDED THAT MR, ZORC CALLED <br />HIM ASKING IF HE WOULD BE OPPOSED TO HIS NAME BEING PLACED AT THE <br />BOTTOM OF THE AD, IN THAT WAY, PEOPLE COULD CONTACT HIM AND EXPRESS <br />THEIR FEELINGS AND OPINIONS REGARDING THE QUESTIONS OUTLINED IN THE <br />AD, COMMISSIONER FLETCHER STATED THAT WAS THE ONLY CONNECTION HIS <br />NAME HAD WITH THE AD, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS ASKED IF COMMISSIONER FLETCHER FELT HIS <br />LAW OFFICE HAD INCURRED ANY IMPROPRIETIES IN THIS MATTER, <br />COMMISSIONER FLETCHER STATED HE DID NOT BELIEVE THAT WAS <br />S0, AND FROM THE INFORMATION GATHERED AT THIS DATE THAT THERE ARE <br />NOT ANY ILLEGALITIES, HE THEN STATED, THAT WHICH IS PROPER IS <br />JUDGED BY A LOT OF DIFFERENT PEOPLE. HE COMMENTED THAT HE WAS <br />GRATIFIED ATTORNEY COLLINS DID MAKE THIS MATTER AS CLEAR AS HE <br />DID, AS IT SHED A LOT OF NEW LIGHT ON SOME PAST QUESTIONS, <br />MORE DISCUSSION FOLLOWED, <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THEY HAD DONE EVERYTHING TO AVOID <br />A CONFLICT AND DEEPLY RESENTED THE AD, AND ASKED THE BOARD TO <br />CONSIDER THE VERACITY OF THE AUTHOR, <br />COMMISSIONER WODTKE SPOKE OF THE MERITS OF THE COUNTY <br />ATTORNEY. HE FELT ATTORNEY COLLINS WAS EXTREMELY COMPETENT AND <br />ALWAYS WOULD GO THE EXTRA MILE FOR THE COUNTY, HE THEN APOLOGIZED <br />TO ATTORNEY COLLINS AND TO ATTORNEY CALDWELL FOR THE INFERENCES MADE <br />TO THEM IN THE AD, <br />CHAIRMAN LYONS COMMENTED THAT ATTORNEY COLLINS WAS <br />JUSTIFIABLY OUTRAGED AT THE INNUENDOS THAT HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED; <br />AND HE WAS EQUALLY OUTRAGED, HE FOUND IT SAD TO THINK THAT PEOPLE <br />HAD TO STOOP TO THIS KIND OF THING TO GET ATTENTION. <br />COMMISSIONER SCURLOCK STATED HE SPENT A GREAT DEAL OF TIME <br />WITH ATTORNEY COLLINS YESTERDAY REVIEWING THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF THE <br />INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD EXTENSION, HE WAS ABSOLUTELY CONVINCED THAT <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS WAS BEYOND REPROACH.,AND IT BOTHERED HIM TO SEE <br />A GREAT DEAL OF MISINFORMATION DISSEMINATED OUT INTO THE COMMUNITY, <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.