10/1/1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r 4 BOOK 47 mrA 0 CT .1 1981 Commissioner Wodtke explained that the previous Board went through many hearings at a time when the commercial zoning was 660' deep up and down both sides of 512 and 510. The major property owner, Mr. Ansin, finally conceded that if we left this 35 acres zoned commercial, he would agree to the rezoning of the balance of his commercial property in the area. Commissioner Fletcher did see any need for a node to exceed the existing 35 acres zoned commercial. Motion was made by Commissioner Fletcher to change the designation of the node at the intersection of SR 510 and 512 to neighborhood commercial, or 8 acres. The Motion died for lack of a second. Motion was made by Commissioner Bird, seconded by Commissioner Wodtke, that the commercial node at the intersection of SR 510 and 512 remain 50 acres as designated. Further discussion ensued as to the pros and cons in regard to limiting this node'to the 35 acres presently zoned for commercial. It was emphasized that the major owner had made a large compromise in giving up considerable commercial zoning before. The Chairman called for the question. It was voted on and carried 3 to 2 with Commissioners Fletcher and Scurlock voting in opposition. PROPERTY NORTH OF ROSELAND ROAD - WEST OF U.S.I Planning Director Rever next brought up the property in the Roseland area between the airport and the Sebastian River. The people in this area are concerned and would prefer a designation calling for one unit per acre. Staff's recommendation has been that this could be accomplished by-"' ` working through the zoning process and thereby avoid creating separate little nodules in the Land Use Plan. Mr. Rever emphasized that the intent of the Land Use Plan is to indicate general use of the land. 10 Frank Di Joia spoke for the Roseland Property Owners