Laserfiche WebLink
OCT 1 <br />1981 <br />soon <br />417"!.Au <br />685 <br />suggested, <br />since we have an existing use, that we <br />make <br />Mr. <br />Barnes' entire piece of property industrial. <br />On Motion by Commissioner Wodtke, seconded by <br />Commissioner Bird, Commissioner Fletcher voted in <br />opposition, the Board by a 4 to 1 vote, agreed to reconsider <br />the previous Motion. <br />Discussion followed about this being existing zoning <br />and an existing railroad spur with access to major traffic <br />arteries. Commissioner Wodtke questioned removing 50 acres <br />of industrial area at Durrance Road. <br />Planner Challacombe explained that the industrial was <br />proposed for Durrance Road before they had the MXD category. <br />There are mobile homes and residential around this <br />industrial classification, and in this relatively low <br />density area, industrial really is not appropriate; so, they <br />now are recommending removal of the industrial designation. <br />On Motion by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by <br />Commissioner Wodtke, the Board unanimously approved removal. <br />of the industrial node at Durrance Road and agreed that it <br />should be added to the 100 acre node at the Barnes property <br />on South Winter Beach. Road, making this a 150 industrial node. <br />DISCUSSION RE POSSIBLE MXD ON SR 510 IN WEST WABASSO <br />Ken Pangburn came before the Board to suggest <br />consideration of an MXD designation for a section of SR 510 <br />west of Wabasso Road rather than LD -2. He noted that in <br />this area from Kings Highway to Broxton Road, you have <br />existing businesses (a hotel, laundromat, gas station, pool <br />hall, rooming house, etc.) that would extend beyond an area <br />of 8 acres. <br />Commissioner Scurlock was opposed to any additional <br />MXD, and felt the non -conformity was covered by the Board's"`""`"" <br />Policy statement. The Chairman agreed. <br />It was Planning staff's recommendation that the area <br />remain LD -2 and let the areas along SR 510 that are <br />commercial and industrial be accommodated through the <br />existing node rather than perpetuate a long strip of <br />16 <br />