My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/21/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
10/21/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:19 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:50:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/21/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dr. Phil Morgan, came before the Board and agreed that <br />there would have to be more access to the hospital in the very near <br />future - he also was in favor of getting the paramedics program <br />going. <br />Dan Richey, concerned citizen, was in favor of getting the <br />permitting completed for the project, as a great deal of money had <br />already been spent. <br />Mr. Zorc approached the Board again to suggest that a <br />bridge be built over the railroad tracks on U. S. #1 in order to get <br />to the hospital quickly from the west side of the County. He was <br />hopeful to get the project issue straightened out locally or they <br />would be forced to fight the permitting process, as there were <br />several levels of appeals. As of this date, he noted that he had a <br />fairly large contingency of people to take this matter to court. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Scurlock, seconded by <br />Commissioner Fletcher, that.the Board select Alternative 2, which <br />would complete all the design work at a cost not to exceed $11,620, <br />have the Administrator gather all the alternatives so this matter <br />could be placed on the ballot in a reasonable and well -presented <br />manner at the next election. <br />engineers. <br />Lengthy discussion followed about the contract with the <br />Commissioner Wodtke felt Indian River Boulevard had been <br />a long-standing project and had been a commitment by the Board for <br />a great many years. He did not think that a road could be planned <br />by referendum. Commissioner Wodtke strongly felt that there was <br />a need for this road - it is a vital road and we must have access <br />to the hospital. He commented that so much -time and effort had been <br />put into working on this project, and strongly urged the Board to go <br />through the necessary permitting. Commissioner Wodtke asked the <br />Board not to vote for the Motion but to go to Alternate #3, which <br />would take us through the permitting stages. <br />OCT 211981 25 BOOK 47 PAGE %98 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.