My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/29/1981
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1980's
>
1981
>
10/29/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:49:20 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 1:51:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/29/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OCT 2.919 <br />91 <br />In regard to the Welfare Department, it was noted that <br />this is a mandated program. <br />L. D. Jacobs took the floor and quoted Milton Freidman <br />as stating that 30-35% of all workers in city, county and <br />federal government are not needed; that actually this is <br />just another form of welfare. He commented that possibly <br />Indian River County has only 20% drones and urged that if <br />somebody quits, for instance, just don't replace them. <br />Charles Caldwell felt stated that in regard to property <br />taxes, he felt like the tom cat having an affair with a <br />skunk; he had enjoyed about all he could stand. Mr. <br />Caldwell urged that the Commission cut down wherever <br />possible. <br />Discussion next ensued re the Agricultural Extension <br />Department,, and Commissioner Scurlock wondered if fees could <br />be charged for some of the courses offered. He believed the <br />activities for the agricultural industry and the 4-H program <br />are very worthwhile, but did not feel the taxpayer should <br />have to pay for people to participate in a weight reducing <br />program. <br />Administrator Nelson commented that they have deleted <br />half a position, and this is status quo. The large travel <br />budget for this department was then reviewed and it was <br />noted that this has doubled this year from $800 to $1600. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Fletcher, seconded by <br />Commissioner Scurlock, to adjust the line item for travel <br />for the Agricultural Extension Department from $1600 to <br />$800. <br />Discussion continued re the fact that travel expense <br />has been exceeding $800 in previous years and a great deal <br />of this is concerned with the 4 -Hers through the <br />agricultural program. Commissioner Wodtke suggested that <br />the travel budget be reduced to $1000 rather than $800, and <br />Commissioners Fletcher and Scurlock agreed to this amount <br />and amended their Motion accordingly. It was voted on and <br />18 <br />�Y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.